https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183960 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183960#c6 Michael Matz <matz@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |matz@suse.com --- Comment #6 from Michael Matz <matz@suse.com> --- An even more aggressive solution would be to stop having the pcre2-posix library at all. Sources that consciously want the pcre2 variant of the POSIX regex facility can include pcre2posix.h without other changes in their sources and link against libpcre2 (without -posix). And sources who do not consciously want pcre2 under the POSIX names wouldn't link against libpcre2-posix anyway. So providing libpcre2-posix at all seems to be a mere rope waiting to be hanged by. But if the above is deemed too aggressive, then yeah, at least moving it to a separate package, not pulled in by mere chance, and making sure that no libraries we provide link against it, would be a solution as well. So, thanks for doing that :-) (I came from the gdb side via ncurses to look at this, and my initial reaction was: ncurses linking against pcre2-posix? ugh, disaster in waiting :) ) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.