https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=338119#c10 --- Comment #10 from Luc Verhaegen <lverhaegen@novell.com> 2007-11-19 07:13:33 MST --- 1) are you talking about XvMC here? 2) yes, openchrome quality standards aren't high. 3) this also seems a very broad statement. DRI is on par with free driver support, just that via dri is a binary only. DRI here is usually broken and should usually get disabled, but YMMV. The big problem is the next two statements: any X driver should just work. It should be compiled against a given DRM driver version, and should Just Work with ABI compatible versions. And even then, when the versions differ too much, there should still be the ability to use some of the DRM functionality. On my unichrome driver, i am able to support many different drm versions, by taking the most compatible route at both compile and run time. Also, XvMC for via/openchrome means involving DRM as well, for some undescribable reason. If you want to keep XvMC running, you better keep it in check with your drm version. So a rather pointless dependency turns into a major nightmare. I hope to be able to spend some time on this hardware soon and really advance the unichrome driver. For my ITO time, i intend to add proper mpeg acceleration. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.