https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=888177
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=888177#c1
Adrian Schröter changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #1 from Adrian Schröter 2014-07-22 09:09:03 UTC ---
1) The individual services are (and have to be) documented in their package.
There are the /usr/lib/obs/service/$NAME.service files inside which have to
contain the documentation.
Bugreports need to go to the individual service maintainers therefore. Most of
them are maintained on github these day, so it might be a good idea to create
issues there directly.
2) Adding src.rpms and git remote urls support got broken in osc and webui
unfortunatly. Fixed this now for both in git master, so "osc add git://" and
adding a git URL as remote file in webui is working again (but not yet
deployed).
I extended the best practice OBS docu also with an example for osc.
3) dunno what you mean here.
In short, yes, we need better documentation everywhere, but time is limited
(and source services were just my personal hackweek project actually.
unfornatly we even had to remove the webui editor for it due to rails changes
and lack of time to adapt it).
I fail also to follow various wiki pages (often with wrong content), so if you
want to work on improving docu please use our official docu which get a review.
So misleading content should be avoided there :)
http://openbuildservice.org/help/manuals/obs-reference-guide/cha.obs.source_...
http://openbuildservice.org/help/manuals/obs-best-practices/cha.obs.best-pra...
there is also a section describing how to work on these.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
