http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=535888 User urwald@gmx-topmail.de added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=535888#c10 --- Comment #10 from Tim Fechtner <urwald@gmx-topmail.de> 2009-10-01 09:29:33 MDT --- Hm. "We get nothing" is maybe a little bit exessiv. I wanted to say that with the actual KDE4 integration we get a result that doesn't looks much poorer than the KDE3 integration, but has as many disadvantages that it makes working with OOo very painfull. It is not nice that KDE3 doesn't fit on the Live CD anymore :-( but we can't change it. I understand the problem. So the choise is only between the actual KDE4 integration (not nice at all + painfully slow) and no KDE integration at all (not nice + fast), right? I personally would prefer no KDE integration. Maybe that's a subjectiv choise, but I just don't think that it is good to deliver an office application that can't run with acceptable speed. However, IMHO the question is: 1.) Is it really sure that there will be online update that fixes the issue? If no, I would prefer drop KDE4 integration. If yes: 2.) Is it possible that the KDE4 integration stays disabled by default after the installation from CD and is later enabled by default when the online update is available? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.