15 Feb
2007
15 Feb
'07
09:23
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239101 ------- Comment #26 from bernhard.bender@web.de 2007-02-15 02:23 MST -------
Why do you think the second core is not active after the resume?
Its because kpowersave's status display: after the original boot, it shows the clock for both CPUs (changing 800/1600MHz) after resume, it shows clock for CPU_0 and "CPU inactive" or similar for CPU_1 Possibly this is a bug in kpowersave; where do I get the kernel's view of which CPUs are active? (/proc/cpuinfo shows no difference afaik) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.