http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1029961 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1029961#c2 --- Comment #2 from Daniel Molkentin <daniel.molkentin@suse.com> --- Quoting the linked text: "/bin contains commands that may be used by both the system administrator and by users, but which are required when no other filesystems are mounted (e.g. in single user mode)." With systemd, the notion of /usr potentially not being available is over. It has to be part of the root file system, or in a filesystem that can be mounted simultaniously. In that sense, we already obsoleted that part of FHS 3.0 implicitly by moving to systemd. We do not have to do symlinks and do like Fedora does, i.e. symlinking /bin to /usr/bin. However, dimstar pointed out that this could cause problems with legacy packages. that install a file to /bin while another package has the same file in /usr/bin. Either way, having _some_ base system packages in /bin and not others is not helping the cause. And IMHO, there is neither a good point nor a feasible way in re-introducing /bin, nor would it have a real purpose. Please help me out if I am missing something essential here (other than adhering to an already implicitly obsoleted standard). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.