https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202353 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202353#c30 --- Comment #30 from Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@suse.com> --- (In reply to Martin Wilck from comment #22)
(In reply to Jiri Slaby from comment #20)
Another question: should we add Requires(post): suse-module-tools at all
No, we should add Requires: suse-module-tools (for modprobe.d) and leave the kernel-rpm-scriptlets deps in place (for transaction ordering).
Note that with Ludwig's PR (see also https://github.com/openSUSE/suse-module-tools/pull/64), suse-kernel-rpm-scriptlets will be separate from s-m-t. While in the first iteration the split-out scriptlets package will require s-m-t, that won't necessarily be the case in the future. IOW: packages that depend on other parts of s-m-t besides the scriptlets should add explicit dependencies on s-m-t. FWIW, as far as the kernel is concerned, a weak dependency might be sufficient because the kernel doesn't strictly require the default modprobe.d files. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.