http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=568280 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=568280#c27 --- Comment #27 from Dr. Werner Fink <werner@novell.com> 2010-01-18 10:00:53 UTC ---
From `osc request show --diff 29928' I've seen:
--- ghostscript-library.changes --- ghostscript-library.changes @@ -2 +2 @@ -Mon Nov 30 14:42:21 CET 2009 - werner@suse.de +Wed Jan 13 07:47:37 UTC 2010 - davejplater@gmail.com @@ -4 +4,2 @@ -- Fix possible vulnerability in ghostscript 8.64 (bnc#559122) +- Merged fc10 ghostscript-fPIC.patch and ghostscript-gs-executable.patch + with ghostscriipt-8.70.dif @@ -7 +8 @@ -Tue Nov 24 11:28:03 CET 2009 - werner@suse.de +Tue Jan 12 13:30:09 UTC 2010 - davejplater@gmail.com @@ -9,3 +10,30 @@ -- Add patch to correct bitcmyk blank output on e.g. Samsung CLP-300 - and other printers (bnc# 557948) -- Do not destroy upstream patches due fuzz=0 +- Fixed ghostscriipt-8.64.dif and renamed to ghostscriipt-8.70.dif +- Split off man page fixes to a separate patch :- + ghostscriipt-8.70-manpages.patch + +------------------------------------------------------------------- +Tue Jan 12 07:28:16 UTC 2010 - davejplater@gmail.com + and --- ghostscript-mini.changes --- ghostscript-mini.changes @@ -2,12 +1,0 @@ -Mon Nov 30 14:42:21 CET 2009 - werner@suse.de - -- Fix possible vulnerability in ghostscript 8.64 (bnc#559122) - -------------------------------------------------------------------- -Tue Nov 24 11:28:03 CET 2009 - werner@suse.de - -- Add patch to correct bitcmyk blank output on e.g. Samsung CLP-300 - and other printers (bnc# 557948) -- Do not destroy upstream patches due fuzz=0 - -------------------------------------------------------------------- which indicates to me that the changelogs are not the latest one. In other words could be changes which are missed I guess. You could try to check the latest source with osc co Publishing ghostscript-library to see if there are really any difference. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.