https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=391453 User delder@novacoast.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=391453#c3 --- Comment #3 from Dan Elder <delder@novacoast.com> 2008-05-30 09:34:15 MDT --- I actually seem to be having a slightly different problem. I can set the routes manually like that and reproduce the routing table that a straight vpnc connection would give me: 10.21.6.203 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 tun3 10.1.90.19 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 tun3 10.1.0.34 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 tun3 10.21.6.204 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 tun3 10.22.4.152 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 tun3 10.22.4.149 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 tun3 10.1.0.203 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 tun3 10.1.0.204 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 tun3 Unfortunately, I still can't connect to any endpoints when using nm. This particular vpn configuration is very restrictive on the policy side which is why I'm usually lazy and use 10.0.0.0/8 so I don't have to manually setup routes to any devices they don't explicitly push routes for. I unfortunately don't know any of the details of the remote cisco setup. It doesn't look like there is any problem with routing from what I can see but maybe I'm missing something. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.