https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222429 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222429#c5 Wenruo Qu <wqu@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(jslaby@suse.com) --- Comment #5 from Wenruo Qu <wqu@suse.com> --- Personally speaking, if you're going to use "rescue=" option, your fs is already screwed up on most cases. Furthermore, most rescue= options would require ro mount option, and can not be remounted to RW, this is by design. So I do not think we need "norecovery" mount option for btrfs at all. Any more explanation on the "norecovery" mount option usage? Maybe I'm missing something critical. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.