http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=580988 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=580988#c5 --- Comment #5 from Francis Lamonde <frankebay99@gmail.com> 2010-02-26 21:25:51 UTC --- Ok so 'sensors' before STR returns CHASSIS FANS around 611rpm (let's forget CPU FAN). Then STR. Then waking up from STR (letting CPU, Cores and Case temps increasing to normal and idle temps for better comparison). Then 'sensors' returns this: == atk0110-acpi-0 Adapter: ACPI interface Vcore Voltage: +1.16 V (min = +0.85 V, max = +1.60 V) +3.3 Voltage: +3.30 V (min = +2.97 V, max = +3.63 V) +5 Voltage: +4.94 V (min = +4.50 V, max = +5.50 V) +12 Voltage: +11.98 V (min = +10.20 V, max = +13.80 V) CPU FAN Speed: 878 RPM (min = 600 RPM) CHASSIS1 FAN Speed: 811 RPM (min = 600 RPM) CHASSIS2 FAN Speed: 770 RPM (min = 600 RPM) CHASSIS3 FAN Speed: 781 RPM (min = 800 RPM) CPU Temperature: +25.0°C (high = +60.0°C, crit = +95.0°C) MB Temperature: +27.0°C (high = +45.0°C, crit = +95.0°C) coretemp-isa-0000 Adapter: ISA adapter Core 0: +40.0°C (high = +82.0°C, crit = +100.0°C) coretemp-isa-0001 Adapter: ISA adapter Core 1: +39.0°C (high = +82.0°C, crit = +100.0°C) coretemp-isa-0002 Adapter: ISA adapter Core 2: +32.0°C (high = +82.0°C, crit = +100.0°C) coretemp-isa-0003 Adapter: ISA adapter Core 3: +36.0°C (high = +82.0°C, crit = +100.0°C) w83627dhg-isa-0290 Adapter: ISA adapter Vcore: +1.16 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +1.74 V) in1: +1.71 V (min = +1.02 V, max = +1.02 V) ALARM AVCC: +3.30 V (min = +1.02 V, max = +0.54 V) ALARM VCC: +3.30 V (min = +2.06 V, max = +1.15 V) ALARM in4: +1.38 V (min = +0.51 V, max = +0.05 V) ALARM in5: +1.65 V (min = +0.01 V, max = +1.03 V) ALARM in6: +1.39 V (min = +0.26 V, max = +0.00 V) ALARM 3VSB: +3.30 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +0.29 V) ALARM Vbat: +3.26 V (min = +2.06 V, max = +2.08 V) ALARM fan1: 795 RPM (min = 2636 RPM, div = 32) ALARM fan2: 902 RPM (min = 1298 RPM, div = 8) ALARM fan3: 795 RPM (min = 2636 RPM, div = 32) ALARM fan5: 770 RPM (min = 1318 RPM, div = 8) ALARM temp1: +27.0°C (high = +9.0°C, hyst = +80.0°C) sensor = thermistor temp2: +25.0°C (high = +80.0°C, hyst = +75.0°C) sensor = diode temp3: +121.5°C (high = +80.0°C, hyst = +75.0°C) ALARM sensor = thermistor === CHASSIS FANS are around 811 when I wake up from STR (and computer is colder at that point in time). I know I can control my fans based on 2 drivers, the 'atk0110' and the usual 'hwmon'. I use the 'hwmon' cuz I have a kernel parm setup at boot time in menu.lst which states the following: 'acpi_enforce_resources=lax' to support some legacy apci stuff, this changed starting with kernel 2.6.30 to prevent some very rare situations where something really bad could happen on a machine and it would kill all fans, leaving no control over temp increases. This is not my case, I verified on the web which machines this could happen to and how. I found much harder to get the sensors setup with 'atk0110' driver, 'pwmconfig' did not want to run so I went back with legacy support. 'rclm_sensors restart' seems to work. It restarted sensors and fancontrol Shutting down sensors, stopping fan control: done Starting up sensors, starting fan control: done It's just that today is warmer in my place, by 2-3C, so now the case temps have gone up 1-2C over the usual, it's now too late for me to compare. The comparison I did above is good though, cuz at the time I typed in 'sensors' the temps were as usual (cpu-case 28-26). I'm running fancontrol and gkrellm for over 2 years, I know my sensor values by heart and I can predict how they will behave when I come across a change in the normal situation (just like now). This is really good to get valid tests and results and compare what should be compared. Let me try something else. If I kill fancontrol now and restart it, the way I was doing before, my speeds should come back to what they are now. And they do. This tells me 'rclm_sensors restart' works, cuz fancontrol was working, I killed it and restarted it. Each increment of my fancontrol settings never match the ones of my BIOS. This is another trick for me to know if fancontrol runs or not. :) I will try your script. If it works, we'll see how valid a fix this is, but if it does work, I will certainly keep it until something better, if better is possible, will exist. I should post results this w-e. tnx -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.