https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205407 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205407#c4 Lubos Kocman <lubos.kocman@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(lubos.kocman@suse | |.com) | --- Comment #4 from Lubos Kocman <lubos.kocman@suse.com> --- If we have to revisit this topic, then I'd like to take the same choice that will be in the ALP. Therefore I defer to discussion with the Bootable images work group. My personal view: I like the minimal and recommended sizes documented in https://github.com/yast/yast-storage-ng/blob/master/doc/boot-requirements.md I recall bugs where the partition was too small for certain use cases. Disk size is cheap, reducing the size again could lead to new bugs in corner cases, etc. My preference is to be on the safe side and stay with the current implementation. As we've discussed on IRC, all new HW nowadays usually comes with 1TB drives. Aside from that 512 MB seem to be in sync with Fedora, so I don't see a big reason to change it. Is there any chance that OEMs would be utilizing some more space there? Let me ask Tuxedo. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.