https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=206927 ------- Comment #13 from schubi@novell.com 2006-10-06 06:36 MST ------- comment #12 (comment #10) Question 1: In that case the patch require an explicit version of the message. Question 2: Not really, cause a message could belong to that patch only. If you use ">=" you could get a message from a newer patch while installing an older explizit. So the better way would be to give the message a special name. In our case Rudi has nameed the message "message-<patchID>" comment #12 (comment #10) Currently only atoms are allowed parallel instalation. Kernel are distinguished by the name (kernen-<flavour>). I prefer not making additional exception for other resolveables. I our case two kernel patches has been selected for installation ( not by the user, but by the package bindings). If we would allow parallel installation of messages the next step would have been that we would have gotten an error message that parallel installation of patches are not allowed. So we can avoid these conflicts by not allowing pararallel installation of patches at the same time with the same name but different versions. BUT selecting a desired patch with a special version, down- or upgrading is allowed at every time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.