https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=751558 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=751558#c20 --- Comment #20 from Olaf Hering <ohering@suse.com> 2013-07-17 10:15:33 CEST --- (In reply to comment #18)
(In reply to comment #17)
(In reply to comment #16)
Except for the missing mkinitrd directories, yes.
What do you? In the spec file '%dir ...' missing?
I don't want to see mkinitrd directories owned by systemd package. They should be owned by mkinitrd package only. There is no point in owning those directories in systemd.
No idea who came up with such statements that owning dirs is bad, its certainly wrong. As said in comment #10 and comment #12, not owning parent directories is bad. If the dir ever changes or if both packages are removed, systemd will leave a /lib/mkinitrd/setup dir behind because rpm can not know that it has to remove /lib/mkinitrd (if systemd.rpm happens to be the last owner in the chain). And just using "/lib/mkinitrd" will tell rpm to recursivly package that dir and its content. The long form would be "%dir /lib/mkinitrd; %dir /lib/mkinitrd/setup; /lib/mkinitrd/setup/*". The latter just clutters spec files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.