https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480746 User bluedzins@wp.pl added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480746#c2 Maciej Pilichowski <bluedzins@wp.pl> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW Info Provider|bluedzins@wp.pl | Summary|software management: |software management: use |packages from imaginary |repo's names as source of |repositories (incorrect |the package |names) | --- Comment #2 from Maciej Pilichowski <bluedzins@wp.pl> 2009-03-02 09:13:20 MST --- Ok, thank you for explanation, but I don't agree there is nothing wrong? Software repositories uses NAME and ADDRESS per repo, software manager should use at least one of them, because otherwise I cannot tell which repo I am using. For me opensuse_11 opensuse_7 are meaningless texts. But since this is flaw in design I change the summary. So currently the issue is -- use the same "name" (or description, or another entity) for repo in BOTH software repositories and software manager so the user could have full control (have full information) from where the package is coming. Why I said flaw -- because now the name is just a eye candy. I spend some time to set meaningful names, futile effort from what you said. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.