https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221515 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221515#c16 --- Comment #16 from Olivier Belleux <o.g.m.belleux@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Fabian Vogt from comment #14)
Those packages are a hard dependency of plasma6-workspace, it's not possible to install without those. Do you have any zypper locks defined or not set the repo priorities appropriately?
I may have found the culprit in this mess. Strangely enough, it's the only package that would have caught my attention and that has remained discreet. I deactivated the repositories as follows zypper repos # | Alias | Enabled | GPG Check | Refresh | Priority ---+-------------------------------+---------+-----------+---------+--------- 1 | DepotLocal | No | ---- | ---- | 99 2 | Graphics | No | ---- | ---- | 99 3 | KDE-KF5 | Yes | (r ) Yes | Yes | 80 4 | KDE-KF6 | Yes | (r ) Yes | Yes | 75 5 | KDE-Qt5 | Yes | (r ) Yes | Yes | 80 6 | KDE-Qt6 | Yes | (r ) Yes | Yes | 75 7 | KDE:Extra | Yes | (r ) Yes | Yes | 80 8 | KDE:Gear | Yes | (r ) Yes | Yes | 80 9 | Libdvdcss | No | ---- | ---- | 99 10 | LibreOffice_24.2 | No | ---- | ---- | 99 11 | Mozilla | No | ---- | ---- | 99 12 | Network | No | ---- | ---- | 99 13 | Packman | No | ---- | ---- | 99 14 | Security | No | ---- | ---- | 99 15 | home_Wolfheri | Yes | (r ) Yes | Yes | 99 16 | home_Wolfheri_Qt5 | Yes | (r ) Yes | Yes | 99 17 | jami | No | ---- | ---- | 99 18 | openSUSE_Debug-Non-Oss | No | ---- | ---- | 99 19 | openSUSE_Debug-Oss | No | ---- | ---- | 99 20 | openSUSE_Non-Oss | No | ---- | ---- | 99 21 | openSUSE_Oss | Yes | (r ) Yes | Yes | 99 22 | openSUSE_Source-Non-Oss | No | ---- | ---- | 99 23 | openSUSE_Source-Oss | No | ---- | ---- | 99 24 | openSUSE_Tools | No | ---- | ---- | 99 25 | openSUSE_Update-Debug-Non-Oss | No | ---- | ---- | 99 26 | openSUSE_Update-Debug-Oss | No | ---- | ---- | 99 27 | openSUSE_Update-Non-Oss | No | ---- | ---- | 99 28 | openSUSE_Update-Oss | Yes | (r ) Yes | Yes | 99 29 | repo-backports-debug-update | No | ---- | ---- | 99 30 | repo-backports-update | Yes | (r ) Yes | Yes | 99 31 | repo-openh264 | No | ---- | ---- | 99 32 | repo-sle-debug-update | No | ---- | ---- | 99 33 | repo-sle-update | Yes | (r ) Yes | Yes | 99 34 | vivaldi | No | ---- | ---- | 99 Then I tried an upgrade which gave me an error message involving kmymoney and texmaker. After uninstalling texmaker, I get an upgrade proposal with 324 packages to upgrade, 179 to downgrade, 707 new, 1 to reinstall, 179 to remove, 153 to change vendor. Overall download size: 1,11 GiB. Already cached: 0 B. After the operation, additional 773,6 MiB will be used. Continue? [y/n/v/...? shows all options] (y): n So more new and uninstalled packages than ever before, including the 4 packages I had to install manually. If I try ti install texmaker, I get zin texmaker Loading repository data... Reading installed packages... Resolving package dependencies... Problem: the to be installed texmaker-5.1.4-lp155.98.1.x86_64 requires 'libQt5Core.so.5(Qt_5.15.13_PRIVATE_API)(64bit)', but this requirement cannot be provided not installable providers: libQt5Core5-5.15.13+kde138-lp155.1.1.x86_64[KDE-Qt5] Solution 1: Following actions will be done: downgrade of kmymoney-5.1.3-lp155.107.28.x86_64 to kmymoney-5.1.3-kf.110.3.x86_64 deinstallation of libKPim5Itinerary5-23.08.4-lp155.188.5.x86_64 deinstallation of libKPim5GrantleeTheme5-23.08.4-lp155.252.2.x86_64 deinstallation of libKPim5libkleo5-23.08.4-lp155.263.2.x86_64 deinstallation of libKPim5Ldap5-23.08.4-lp155.271.2.x86_64 Solution 2: do not install texmaker-5.1.4-lp155.98.1.x86_64 Solution 3: break texmaker-5.1.4-lp155.98.1.x86_64 by ignoring some of its dependencies It's already late to try an upgrade, so I'll look into it later this week. Maybe one should just compile texmaker for Qt6/kf6? For information Fedora 39 compiles it with Qt5, but 40 and rawhide with Qt6 https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/texmaker/blob/f40/f/texmaker.spec Thanks -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.