https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=390722 User Janne.Karhunen@gmail.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=390722#c31 Janne Karhunen <Janne.Karhunen@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |Janne.Karhunen@gmail.com --- Comment #31 from Janne Karhunen <Janne.Karhunen@gmail.com> 2008-05-26 16:24:03 MDT ---
(The speculation about -fomit-frame-pointer doesn't apply either, because we don't compile with that option on i386, otherwise also valgrind would be lost)
A while back I experimented with libsegfault by adding it threading support and some other fancy stuff such as 'file:line' DWARF data extract. Once testing that prior to sending it out to libc-alpha I found the frame pointer trail to be highly unreliable even when 'omit-frame-pointer' is not being used. Heck, even libc sleep() seemed to be using ebp/rbp for something else destroying the trail :/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.