https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=354554 User mkoenig@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=354554#c20 --- Comment #20 from Matthias Koenig <mkoenig@novell.com> 2008-05-05 06:42:03 MST --- There are some problems with the vim patch. Currently we have /bin/vim-normal as default vim and /usr/bin/vim-enhanced. As the patch links against libhunspell which lives in /usr/lib{,64} we cannot link /bin/vim-normal against this. This would require either moving libhunspell to /lib{,64} which is not want we want (libhunspell itself also links against /usr/lib{,64}/libstdc++), or building /bin/vim-normal without syntax features at all (as the spell features seem to be tightly coupled to the general syntax features), which I also don't want. The best solution would be to provide a /bin/vim-tiny with minimal features and moving /bin/vim-normal to /usr/bin/vim-normal. But this will not happen for 11.0, as it will need yet another vim package restructuring. But, despite of this, yes, I think using hunspell is a good idea, as the vim dictionaries are derived from the OO ones and would otherwise waste a lot of space by duplicated data. Also worth mentioning, that this patch has been sent a year ago to upstream. While the idea has been appreciated, the patch has been rejected as is, AFAIK there has not been any work to improve this: http://www.mail-archive.com/vim-dev@vim.org/msg03252.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.