https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223967 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223967#c16 --- Comment #16 from Atri Bhattacharya <badshah400@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #14)
Note this is where it might be important that the hwcaps and non-hwcaps variant alternatives come from the same implementation unless the ABIs are 100% the same. So I think ideally the alternatives setup would have a link group and a single config to adjust. Not sure if it's done this way and whether it's possible at all if the group is split between two packages.
We should probably implement a main and slave alternatives setup anyway so that both libblas.so.* and liblapack.so.* come from the same implementation. At the moment, my understanding is that one could theoretically use blas from implementation A (say, openblas) while still using cblas and lapack from the implementation B (reference netlib library, for example). I do not know whether this kind of usage is advisable. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.