19 Jan
2007
19 Jan
'07
12:25
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=214277 ------- Comment #4 from matz@novell.com 2007-01-19 05:25 MST ------- Yes, I know. But as written in the initial report rc is == -1, so the only use of 'con' is in a dead branch. For this code under these circumstances it doesn't matter if we handle '&con' as initializing or not, the only use would be dead anyway. That's what I was referring to when I said the warning is not control dependend. I.e. the interesting thing here is not the call with the reference parameter. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.