https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=896438 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=896438#c18 --- Comment #18 from Lars Heide <itsbo@fz-juelich.de> 2014-09-15 16:56:06 UTC --- (In reply to comment #17)
This is not related to delta rpms.
At the time of the warning, the update stack has not even looked at the RPM, but just the metadata.
As we currently do not specify the fileprovides /lib/ld-linux.so.2 explicity in the metadata, the update stack assumes it gets removed.
I might lack a more fundamental understanding here. Is depending on a file instead of a "Capability" not permitted in a way? I agree that the package should depend on a Capability (e.g. ld-linux.so.2) instead of a file and we can not fix that but I have not heard of this before. If I understand you correctly this should happen every time somebody depends on a file (instead of a capability) and if the package owning that file gets updated this would result in the reported error? And you look only at the metadata of the RPM (which does not provide a filelist) but not at the metadata of the repository (which does, doesn't it?). Sorry for the inconvenience. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.