http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494200 User poletti.marco@gmail.com added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494200#c4 Marco Poletti <poletti.marco@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |REOPENED Resolution|INVALID | --- Comment #4 from Marco Poletti <poletti.marco@gmail.com> 2009-09-23 22:22:50 CEST --- I reopen this for 3 reasons: 1) "lcov" is not only used for kernel, people expect to find it in a package called "lcov" (or similar) as Ubuntu and Fedora do. 2) People that use "cnf lcov" and run the suggested ("sudo zypper in [...]") command shouldn't get all kernel-source installed. 3) There is no intuitive way to install it right (without downloading 300MB right away and after each kernel update) in the first place: you have to know those rarely-used zypper options and know you should use them in this case. I see no disadvantages in splitting this, apart from the initial work required for splitting. People that install kernel-coverage will have both lcov and kernel-source. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.