https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1191514 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1191514#c1 --- Comment #1 from Egbert Eich <eich@suse.com> --- Created attachment 853053 --> https://bugzilla.suse.com/attachment.cgi?id=853053&action=edit Difference between busybox-static.config and busybox.config From kukuk on https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/924423: Comment: 1. The configs are in sync, don't bring them out of sync! 2. reboot conflicts with everything else and needs adjustments and new packages, since we make excessive usage of them in Factory and in the future in SLE15. Statement 1. is contradicted by the difference in configuration which is attached. A number of SELinux functions are enabled in the dynamic version which are not present in the static one. Here is a list of commands present in the dynamic version but not in the static one: chcon getenforce getsebool load_policy matchpathcon restorecon runcon selinuxenabled sestatus setenforce setfiles setsebool To a casual busybox bystander, it is not clear what the level of expected synchronization is between the static and dynamic variant of busybox. An explanation in the spec file would be in order. As for statement 2., this is the very reason this ticket exists. I've already made this suggestion. It seems much easier to discuss this here than in the comment section to a submission. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.