https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=886512 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=886512#c6 Christian Boltz <suse-beta@cboltz.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|WONTFIX | --- Comment #6 from Christian Boltz <suse-beta@cboltz.de> 2014-08-26 19:35:16 CEST --- (In reply to comment #2)
Reading manual pages may help, e.g. man:systemctl(1)
-a, --all When listing units, show all loaded units, regardless of their state, including inactive units. When showing unit/job/manager properties, show all properties regardless whether they are set or not.
@Werner: This only works with list-units. list-unit-files ignores traditional initscripts (even with -a, not sure if -a changes anything). Is this intentional or a bug? (In reply to comment #5)
It's not WONTFIX but CANTFIX, Yast can either support one or another. There's nobody who would developer and support both at the same time.
Well, using "list-units --all" instead of "list-unit-files" might already be enough. A quick grep through services_manager_service.rb indicates YaST is using both: class ServicesManagerServiceClass < Module LIST_UNIT_FILES_COMMAND = 'systemctl list-unit-files --type service' LIST_UNITS_COMMAND = 'systemctl list-units --all --type service' STATUS_COMMAND = 'systemctl status' Note: I didn't check what YaST does with the result of both commands. I know "just use list-units --all" sounds easy in theory, but I also know practise is usually more difficult ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.