https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821879 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821879#c36 --- Comment #36 from Marius Tomaschewski <mt@suse.com> 2013-06-07 06:35:29 UTC --- (In reply to comment #29)
it might be worth shipping a .service for the "ifup" way of network, which can then tell systemd to accept additional error code (SuccessExitStatus,RestartPreventExitStatus, see man systemd.service)
BTW: Basically the only possibility to avoid all this trouble I see -- except of comment 29 -- is to use something like this: --- a/scripts/network +++ b/scripts/network @@ -906,6 +906,8 @@ case "$ACTION" in reload_firewall + # do not report any errors to systemd + test "$SD_RUNNING" = "yes" && rc_reset ;; stop) But is this really something we should use?! Frederic, would it be possible to implement: X-Systemd-RestartPreventExitStatus: ... X-Systemd-SuccessExitStatus: ... ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.