https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=343812#c3 Christian Trippe <christiandehne@web.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |christiandehne@web.de Status|NEEDINFO |NEW Info Provider|christiandehne@web.de | --- Comment #3 from Christian Trippe <christiandehne@web.de> 2007-11-30 07:35:46 MST --- (In reply to comment #2 from Werner Fink)
IMHO you should report this upstream. Before doing so I'd like to know if the option dvipdfmx for the graphics style was enabled.
For me it does not make a change if use \usepackage{graphicx} or \usepackage[dvipdfmx]{graphicx} In bose cases dvipdfm works, but dvipdfmx not. I have also tried both commands from console. Here is the result for dvipdfmx: dvipdfmx test.dvi test.dvi -> test.pdf [1 ** WARNING ** No image converter available for converting file "./induktion.eps" to PDF format. ** WARNING ** >> Please check if you have 'D' option in config file. ** WARNING ** pdf: image inclusion failed for "induktion.eps". ** WARNING ** Failed to read image file: induktion.eps ** WARNING ** Interpreting special command PSfile (ps:) failed. ** WARNING ** >> at page="1" position="(133.768, 340.189)" (in PDF) ** WARNING ** >> xxx "PSfile="induktion.eps" llx=0 lly=0 urx=322 ury=198 rwi=3220 " ] 15934 bytes written
Beside this IMHO it would be better to use pdflatex to skip the step of having a dvi files around for a resulting pdf file.
I usually do this, so I found this more or less by accident. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.