https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=397411 User freeform.reform@gmail.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=397411#c11 --- Comment #11 from Peter Keenig <freeform.reform@gmail.com> 2008-06-09 04:30:37 MDT --- #9 First, am not complaining, at least I hope I don't sound like it. Second, no my remark is, that IF I encrypt root and home (as offered by the installer now, which is a great feature added, since before I could only encrypt home) I can't hibernate, since hibernation does not work on encrypted partition. So it's more like "option to encrypt root/home breaks hibernation functionality" (since I can only hibernate to root, correct?). That swap itself should be encrypted as well would probably be more an "additional feature request". But if hibernation would work on encrypted partitions, the hibernation file itself would already be encrypted and thus not be able to leak information. I'm not 100% sure but I think Fedora 9 somehow solved the problem of hibernating to an encrypted partition, at least the corresponding bug report has been closed: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247794 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.