https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=641257 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=641257#c2 --- Comment #2 from Peter Poeml <poeml@cmdline.net> 2010-09-23 08:29:09 UTC --- There is a misundestanding. To make a long story short: David sees very slow downloads. I cannot reproduce them with aria2c 1.9.5. I can reproduce them with aria2c 1.10.3 though. Hence my question whether David uses version 1.10.x. He doesn't. Hence, I cannot reproduce the problem that David is seeing. Hence, there is no conclusion by me that updating aria2c would be of any use. And if aria2c would be updated, version 1.10.x would need to be used with two new options, because otherwise it behaves exactly like what David is experiencing. Which is the reason why I asked for the version he uses. Unfortunately, everybody on the mailing list seems to have understood something else :-) The question is why David's aria2c 1.9.x version doesn't use all mirrors. If it would use all mirrors, it wouldn't get stuck with the single bad mirror. The whole point of using aria2c as download backend is to be less dependent on 100% working mirrors (which can never be achieved anyway). David, maybe you could attach a debug log... using --log=aria2c.log instead of --log=-. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.