http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=907692 grant k <grantksupport@operamail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|FEATURE |--- Flags| |needinfo?(tiwai@suse.com) --- Comment #15 from grant k <grantksupport@operamail.com> --- (In reply to Takashi Iwai from comment #14)
Ah OK, I read the whole report again and understood the issue. Sorry for the noise.
The reported problem is basically harmless. It's just a part of automatic load for aes. These modules give the same alias to "aes". Some of modules are hardware specific, so it returns -ENODEV at module init. This results in such error messages.
So, unless you really see the real problem (e.g. something doesn't work as expected), just ignore these messages. These are there as designed, no real errors. I understand this is ugly, but that's life.
the remaining issue, relevant to case (3), is that only -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 11K Nov 26 01:13 sha512_generic.ko exists sha1_generic.ko sha256_generic.ko are missing. see Comment #9, above -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.