On 11/19/2012 10:32 AM, Lukas Ocilka wrote:
On 11/16/2012 06:44 PM, Thomas Fehr wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, Joschi Brauchle wrote:
<location>### remote URL -- This tag is not working ###</location> From the file XML schema, it looks like only "source" and "interpreter" are valid inside the "file_script" tag. Hence, my feature request.
I will have a look after I am back from vacation. Should not be too hard to implement.
Is this really safe? It should be either used on trusted networks or using some secure connection (HTTPS, FTPS) but then it again might be problem with (commonly used) self-signed certificates.
Yes, one should only use this on trusted networks. But, why should this be anymore safe/unsafe than the existing & working <location> tag for the init/chroot/... script sections?