On Sun, 16 Dec 2012 12:04:35 +0100 šumski <hrvoje.senjan@gmail.com> wrote:
I am not sure Rajko meant the KDE's colorscheme (could be wrong though), but generally for the grow concept.
I meant collaboration in general that needs more peer view into what each other are doing. It is easier to spot problems when more eyes are looking at the solutions which leads to early redirection, if necessary, and saves a lot of work that may go in something that people will not accept. I, and more others, may not be able to provide final solution, but it is sure that we can give ideas and comments, in both visual and textual way. There is not many perfect eyes when you check people that look for a long periods of time on a computer screen. There is so many ways that eyes can go bad, with so many levels of badness and combination of elementary defects in optics and sensors, that is literally impossible to satisfy everyone, but it is possible to query as many people as possible to find out which theme is best for majority. Also, there are facts about human brain that are valid for each person (that has some of it). What eyes see is subject to the interpretation by the brain, and it works similar for majority of people. Grow in its initial proposal with darkness and low contrast is failing to convey hope, birth, new start, it is more like dark and low visibility as permanent status. If you don't believe me, recall what each visual art piece, including movies use to create sense of hopelessness and evil reign (dark, grayish, low contrast), and what is used to tell that heroic struggle for good is successful (bright, colorful, high contrast). -- Regards, Rajko. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-artwork+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-artwork+owner@opensuse.org