Hi,
I would like to add support to armv5 kernel-default. Patch is in attachment. Please comment.
I am not sure if it is enough. I added a default config file in config/armv5el and added it to config.conf.
If it is ok, I will send it -kernel ML.
Guillaume
On 10/17/2012 05:00 PM, Guillaume Gardet wrote:
Hi,
I would like to add support to armv5 kernel-default. Patch is in attachment. Please comment.
I don't see an attachment :). But as I stated in my other mail, I don't think a default config actually makes sense for armv5.
Alex
I am not sure if it is enough. I added a default config file in config/armv5el and added it to config.conf.
If it is ok, I will send it -kernel ML.
Guillaume
Le 17/10/2012 19:22, Alexander Graf a écrit :
On 10/17/2012 05:00 PM, Guillaume Gardet wrote:
Hi,
I would like to add support to armv5 kernel-default. Patch is in attachment. Please comment.
I don't see an attachment :). But as I stated in my other mail, I don't think a default config actually makes sense for armv5.
Oups. Attachment is in this e-mail.
kernel-default make sense for qemu and/or versatile platforms.
Guillaume
Alex
I am not sure if it is enough. I added a default config file in config/armv5el and added it to config.conf.
If it is ok, I will send it -kernel ML.
Guillaume
On 10/18/2012 10:39 AM, Guillaume Gardet wrote:
Le 17/10/2012 19:22, Alexander Graf a écrit :
On 10/17/2012 05:00 PM, Guillaume Gardet wrote:
Hi,
I would like to add support to armv5 kernel-default. Patch is in attachment. Please comment.
I don't see an attachment :). But as I stated in my other mail, I don't think a default config actually makes sense for armv5.
Oups. Attachment is in this e-mail.
kernel-default make sense for qemu and/or versatile platforms.
The only reason we have a -default kernel on v7 is that I was hoping we'd get single zImage a bit earlier. Without people actually implementing single zImage on armv5, I don't think the name "default" should exist anywhere in our name space for that platform.
Why would you need a -default kernel?
Alex
Le 18/10/2012 13:43, Alexander Graf a écrit :
On 10/18/2012 10:39 AM, Guillaume Gardet wrote:
Le 17/10/2012 19:22, Alexander Graf a écrit :
On 10/17/2012 05:00 PM, Guillaume Gardet wrote:
Hi,
I would like to add support to armv5 kernel-default. Patch is in attachment. Please comment.
I don't see an attachment :). But as I stated in my other mail, I don't think a default config actually makes sense for armv5.
Oups. Attachment is in this e-mail.
kernel-default make sense for qemu and/or versatile platforms.
The only reason we have a -default kernel on v7 is that I was hoping we'd get single zImage a bit earlier. Without people actually implementing single zImage on armv5, I don't think the name "default" should exist anywhere in our name space for that platform.
Why would you need a -default kernel?
Ok, default is not a right name. Let me rename it qemu or versatile. That way, people can test openSUSE armv5 on qemu (or even on versatile hardware). It will also make a kernel and image templates (and tests) for armv5.
Guillaume
Alex
On 18.10.2012, at 13:52, Guillaume Gardet wrote:
Le 18/10/2012 13:43, Alexander Graf a écrit :
On 10/18/2012 10:39 AM, Guillaume Gardet wrote:
Le 17/10/2012 19:22, Alexander Graf a écrit :
On 10/17/2012 05:00 PM, Guillaume Gardet wrote:
Hi,
I would like to add support to armv5 kernel-default. Patch is in attachment. Please comment.
I don't see an attachment :). But as I stated in my other mail, I don't think a default config actually makes sense for armv5.
Oups. Attachment is in this e-mail.
kernel-default make sense for qemu and/or versatile platforms.
The only reason we have a -default kernel on v7 is that I was hoping we'd get single zImage a bit earlier. Without people actually implementing single zImage on armv5, I don't think the name "default" should exist anywhere in our name space for that platform.
Why would you need a -default kernel?
Ok, default is not a right name. Let me rename it qemu or versatile. That way, people can test openSUSE armv5 on qemu (or even on versatile hardware). It will also make a kernel and image templates (and tests) for armv5.
That sounds like a great idea :).
Alex
Le 18/10/2012 14:03, Alexander Graf a écrit :
On 18.10.2012, at 13:52, Guillaume Gardet wrote:
Le 18/10/2012 13:43, Alexander Graf a écrit :
On 10/18/2012 10:39 AM, Guillaume Gardet wrote:
Le 17/10/2012 19:22, Alexander Graf a écrit :
On 10/17/2012 05:00 PM, Guillaume Gardet wrote:
Hi,
I would like to add support to armv5 kernel-default. Patch is in attachment. Please comment.
I don't see an attachment :). But as I stated in my other mail, I don't think a default config actually makes sense for armv5.
Oups. Attachment is in this e-mail.
kernel-default make sense for qemu and/or versatile platforms.
The only reason we have a -default kernel on v7 is that I was hoping we'd get single zImage a bit earlier. Without people actually implementing single zImage on armv5, I don't think the name "default" should exist anywhere in our name space for that platform.
Why would you need a -default kernel?
Ok, default is not a right name. Let me rename it qemu or versatile. That way, people can test openSUSE armv5 on qemu (or even on versatile hardware). It will also make a kernel and image templates (and tests) for armv5.
That sounds like a great idea :).
Patch is in attachment. If ok, I will submit it to -kernel ML.
Guillaume
Alex
On 18.10.2012, at 14:38, Guillaume Gardet wrote:
Le 18/10/2012 14:03, Alexander Graf a écrit :
On 18.10.2012, at 13:52, Guillaume Gardet wrote:
Le 18/10/2012 13:43, Alexander Graf a écrit :
On 10/18/2012 10:39 AM, Guillaume Gardet wrote:
Le 17/10/2012 19:22, Alexander Graf a écrit :
On 10/17/2012 05:00 PM, Guillaume Gardet wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to add support to armv5 kernel-default. Patch is in attachment. Please comment. I don't see an attachment :). But as I stated in my other mail, I don't think a default config actually makes sense for armv5.
Oups. Attachment is in this e-mail.
kernel-default make sense for qemu and/or versatile platforms.
The only reason we have a -default kernel on v7 is that I was hoping we'd get single zImage a bit earlier. Without people actually implementing single zImage on armv5, I don't think the name "default" should exist anywhere in our name space for that platform.
Why would you need a -default kernel?
Ok, default is not a right name. Let me rename it qemu or versatile. That way, people can test openSUSE armv5 on qemu (or even on versatile hardware). It will also make a kernel and image templates (and tests) for armv5.
That sounds like a great idea :).
Patch is in attachment. If ok, I will submit it to -kernel ML.
+CONFIG_LOCALVERSION="-default"
is bad
What did you base this off of?
Alex
Le 18/10/2012 14:51, Alexander Graf a écrit :
On 18.10.2012, at 14:38, Guillaume Gardet wrote:
Le 18/10/2012 14:03, Alexander Graf a écrit :
On 18.10.2012, at 13:52, Guillaume Gardet wrote:
Le 18/10/2012 13:43, Alexander Graf a écrit :
On 10/18/2012 10:39 AM, Guillaume Gardet wrote:
Le 17/10/2012 19:22, Alexander Graf a écrit : > On 10/17/2012 05:00 PM, Guillaume Gardet wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I would like to add support to armv5 kernel-default. Patch is in attachment. Please comment. > I don't see an attachment :). But as I stated in my other mail, I don't think a default config actually makes sense for armv5. Oups. Attachment is in this e-mail.
kernel-default make sense for qemu and/or versatile platforms.
The only reason we have a -default kernel on v7 is that I was hoping we'd get single zImage a bit earlier. Without people actually implementing single zImage on armv5, I don't think the name "default" should exist anywhere in our name space for that platform.
Why would you need a -default kernel?
Ok, default is not a right name. Let me rename it qemu or versatile. That way, people can test openSUSE armv5 on qemu (or even on versatile hardware). It will also make a kernel and image templates (and tests) for armv5.
That sounds like a great idea :).
Patch is in attachment. If ok, I will submit it to -kernel ML.
+CONFIG_LOCALVERSION="-default"
Oups.
is bad
What did you base this off of?
I used -default from armv7 which is in fact versatile ARM926.
Guillaume
Alex
On 18.10.2012, at 14:53, Guillaume Gardet wrote:
Le 18/10/2012 14:51, Alexander Graf a écrit :
On 18.10.2012, at 14:38, Guillaume Gardet wrote:
Le 18/10/2012 14:03, Alexander Graf a écrit :
On 18.10.2012, at 13:52, Guillaume Gardet wrote:
Le 18/10/2012 13:43, Alexander Graf a écrit :
On 10/18/2012 10:39 AM, Guillaume Gardet wrote: > Le 17/10/2012 19:22, Alexander Graf a écrit : >> On 10/17/2012 05:00 PM, Guillaume Gardet wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I would like to add support to armv5 kernel-default. Patch is in attachment. Please comment. >> I don't see an attachment :). But as I stated in my other mail, I don't think a default config actually makes sense for armv5. > Oups. Attachment is in this e-mail. > > kernel-default make sense for qemu and/or versatile platforms. The only reason we have a -default kernel on v7 is that I was hoping we'd get single zImage a bit earlier. Without people actually implementing single zImage on armv5, I don't think the name "default" should exist anywhere in our name space for that platform.
Why would you need a -default kernel?
Ok, default is not a right name. Let me rename it qemu or versatile. That way, people can test openSUSE armv5 on qemu (or even on versatile hardware). It will also make a kernel and image templates (and tests) for armv5.
That sounds like a great idea :).
Patch is in attachment. If ok, I will submit it to -kernel ML.
+CONFIG_LOCALVERSION="-default"
Oups.
is bad
What did you base this off of?
I used -default from armv7 which is in fact versatile ARM926.
Sounds good then :). Please change the localversion and submit it to the kernel ML :)
Alex
-
Alexander Graf -
Guillaume Gardet