[opensuse-arm] armv7l platform is missed for docker registry.opensuse.org/opensuse/tumbleweed:latest

newer
Aw: Re: [opensuse-arm] Graphics...

Matwey V. Kornilov

5 Feb 2020 5 Feb '20

17:07

Hello, Here (https://registry.opensuse.org/cgi-bin/cooverview ) I see that opensuse/tubmleweed multiplatform docker image supports the following platforms: aarch64 armv6l i586 ppc64le x86_64 However, armv7l is missed for some reason. How could we get it back? -- With best regards, Matwey V. Kornilov -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-arm+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-arm+owner@opensuse.org

Show replies by date

Adrian Schröter

6 Feb 6 Feb

08:08

On Mittwoch, 5. Februar 2020, 18:07:56 CET Matwey V. Kornilov wrote:

...

Hello,

Here (https://registry.opensuse.org/cgi-bin/cooverview ) I see that opensuse/tubmleweed multiplatform docker image supports the following platforms:

aarch64 armv6l i586 ppc64le x86_64

However, armv7l is missed for some reason. How could we get it back?

The docker registry only knows "arm" and "arm64". So armv6l is overwriting armv7hl :/ Guillaume and me decided to unpublish armv6l for now until we found a solution. Renaming the image is bad for references, so I guess we need to publish armv6l in a different repository. Fabian, do you have an opinion here? bye adrian -- Adrian Schroeter Build Infrastructure Project Manager SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nuernberg, Germany (HRB 247165, AG München), Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-arm+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-arm+owner@opensuse.org

Matwey V. Kornilov

08:13

чт, 6 февр. 2020 г. в 11:12, Adrian Schröter :

...

On Mittwoch, 5. Februar 2020, 18:07:56 CET Matwey V. Kornilov wrote:

...
Hello,

Here (https://registry.opensuse.org/cgi-bin/cooverview ) I see that opensuse/tubmleweed multiplatform docker image supports the following platforms:

aarch64 armv6l i586 ppc64le x86_64

However, armv7l is missed for some reason. How could we get it back?

The docker registry only knows "arm" and "arm64". So armv6l is overwriting armv7hl :/

Guillaume and me decided to unpublish armv6l for now until we found a solution.

Renaming the image is bad for references, so I guess we need to publish armv6l in a different repository.

Fabian, do you have an opinion here?

I remember, that once I saw that correct docker platform names are linux/arm/v6 and linux/arm/v7

...

bye adrian

--

Adrian Schroeter Build Infrastructure Project Manager

SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nuernberg, Germany (HRB 247165, AG München), Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer

-- With best regards, Matwey V. Kornilov -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-arm+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-arm+owner@opensuse.org

Adrian Schröter

08:12

On Donnerstag, 6. Februar 2020, 09:13:24 CET Matwey V. Kornilov wrote:

...

чт, 6 февр. 2020 г. в 11:12, Adrian Schröter :

...
On Mittwoch, 5. Februar 2020, 18:07:56 CET Matwey V. Kornilov wrote:

...
Hello,

Here (https://registry.opensuse.org/cgi-bin/cooverview ) I see that opensuse/tubmleweed multiplatform docker image supports the following platforms:

aarch64 armv6l i586 ppc64le x86_64

However, armv7l is missed for some reason. How could we get it back?

The docker registry only knows "arm" and "arm64". So armv6l is overwriting armv7hl :/

Guillaume and me decided to unpublish armv6l for now until we found a solution.

Renaming the image is bad for references, so I guess we need to publish armv6l in a different repository.

Fabian, do you have an opinion here?

I remember, that once I saw that correct docker platform names are linux/arm/v6 and linux/arm/v7

you mean having it in a different repository? yes, that was my proposal as well. The architecture names can not contain these strings .... -- Adrian Schroeter Build Infrastructure Project Manager SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nuernberg, Germany (HRB 247165, AG München), Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-arm+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-arm+owner@opensuse.org

Matwey V. Kornilov

08:17

чт, 6 февр. 2020 г. в 11:15, Adrian Schröter :

...

On Donnerstag, 6. Februar 2020, 09:13:24 CET Matwey V. Kornilov wrote:

...
чт, 6 февр. 2020 г. в 11:12, Adrian Schröter :

...
On Mittwoch, 5. Februar 2020, 18:07:56 CET Matwey V. Kornilov wrote:

...
Hello,

Here (https://registry.opensuse.org/cgi-bin/cooverview ) I see that opensuse/tubmleweed multiplatform docker image supports the following platforms:

aarch64 armv6l i586 ppc64le x86_64

However, armv7l is missed for some reason. How could we get it back?

The docker registry only knows "arm" and "arm64". So armv6l is overwriting armv7hl :/

Guillaume and me decided to unpublish armv6l for now until we found a solution.

Renaming the image is bad for references, so I guess we need to publish armv6l in a different repository.

Fabian, do you have an opinion here?

I remember, that once I saw that correct docker platform names are linux/arm/v6 and linux/arm/v7

you mean having it in a different repository? yes, that was my proposal as well.

No, I mean docker platform names. Look here: https://www.docker.com/blog/getting-started-with-docker-for-arm-on-linux/ Docker people use "Platform: linux/arm64" for aarch64 and "Platform: linux/arm/v7" for armv7.

...

The architecture names can not contain these strings ....

--

Adrian Schroeter Build Infrastructure Project Manager

SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nuernberg, Germany (HRB 247165, AG München), Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer

-- With best regards, Matwey V. Kornilov -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-arm+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-arm+owner@opensuse.org

Adrian Schröter

08:23

On Donnerstag, 6. Februar 2020, 09:17:49 CET Matwey V. Kornilov wrote:

...

чт, 6 февр. 2020 г. в 11:15, Adrian Schröter :

...
On Donnerstag, 6. Februar 2020, 09:13:24 CET Matwey V. Kornilov wrote:

...
чт, 6 февр. 2020 г. в 11:12, Adrian Schröter :

...
On Mittwoch, 5. Februar 2020, 18:07:56 CET Matwey V. Kornilov wrote:

...
Hello,

Here (https://registry.opensuse.org/cgi-bin/cooverview ) I see that opensuse/tubmleweed multiplatform docker image supports the following platforms:

aarch64 armv6l i586 ppc64le x86_64

However, armv7l is missed for some reason. How could we get it back?

The docker registry only knows "arm" and "arm64". So armv6l is overwriting armv7hl :/

Guillaume and me decided to unpublish armv6l for now until we found a solution.

Renaming the image is bad for references, so I guess we need to publish armv6l in a different repository.

Fabian, do you have an opinion here?

I remember, that once I saw that correct docker platform names are linux/arm/v6 and linux/arm/v7

you mean having it in a different repository? yes, that was my proposal as well.

No, I mean docker platform names. Look here:

https://www.docker.com/blog/getting-started-with-docker-for-arm-on-linux/

Docker people use "Platform: linux/arm64" for aarch64 and "Platform: linux/arm/v7" for armv7.

Hm, can you find a real life example in any registry? I like to look at the manifest, because I have no clue atm how this platform string is stored there. It should look like "platform" : { "architecture" : "amd64", "os" : "linux" } but architecture is limited to "Go" architectures which only knows "arm"... They may (mis)use the version string for this? Maybe an option... -- Adrian Schroeter Build Infrastructure Project Manager SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nuernberg, Germany (HRB 247165, AG München), Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-arm+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-arm+owner@opensuse.org

Adrian Schröter

08:25

On Donnerstag, 6. Februar 2020, 09:23:41 CET Adrian Schröter wrote:

...

On Donnerstag, 6. Februar 2020, 09:17:49 CET Matwey V. Kornilov wrote:

...
чт, 6 февр. 2020 г. в 11:15, Adrian Schröter :

...
On Donnerstag, 6. Februar 2020, 09:13:24 CET Matwey V. Kornilov wrote:

...
чт, 6 февр. 2020 г. в 11:12, Adrian Schröter :

...
On Mittwoch, 5. Februar 2020, 18:07:56 CET Matwey V. Kornilov wrote:

...
Hello,

Here (https://registry.opensuse.org/cgi-bin/cooverview ) I see that opensuse/tubmleweed multiplatform docker image supports the following platforms:

aarch64 armv6l i586 ppc64le x86_64

However, armv7l is missed for some reason. How could we get it back?

The docker registry only knows "arm" and "arm64". So armv6l is overwriting armv7hl :/

Guillaume and me decided to unpublish armv6l for now until we found a solution.

Renaming the image is bad for references, so I guess we need to publish armv6l in a different repository.

Fabian, do you have an opinion here?

I remember, that once I saw that correct docker platform names are linux/arm/v6 and linux/arm/v7

you mean having it in a different repository? yes, that was my proposal as well.

No, I mean docker platform names. Look here:

https://www.docker.com/blog/getting-started-with-docker-for-arm-on-linux/

Docker people use "Platform: linux/arm64" for aarch64 and "Platform: linux/arm/v7" for armv7.

Hm, can you find a real life example in any registry?

I like to look at the manifest, because I have no clue atm how this platform string is stored there. It should look like

"platform" : { "architecture" : "amd64", "os" : "linux" }

but architecture is limited to "Go" architectures which only knows "arm"...

They may (mis)use the version string for this?

ah, "variant" might be a way to go ... anyway, would be great if you find a real life example out there... -- Adrian Schroeter Build Infrastructure Project Manager SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nuernberg, Germany (HRB 247165, AG München), Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-arm+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-arm+owner@opensuse.org

Matwey V. Kornilov

08:32

чт, 6 февр. 2020 г. в 11:27, Adrian Schröter :
>
> On Donnerstag, 6. Februar 2020, 09:17:49 CET Matwey V. Kornilov wrote:
> > чт, 6 февр. 2020 г. в 11:15, Adrian Schröter :
> > >
> > > On Donnerstag, 6. Februar 2020, 09:13:24 CET Matwey V. Kornilov wrote:
> > > > чт, 6 февр. 2020 г. в 11:12, Adrian Schröter :
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mittwoch, 5. Februar 2020, 18:07:56 CET Matwey V. Kornilov wrote:
> > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Here (https://registry.opensuse.org/cgi-bin/cooverview ) I see that
> > > > > > opensuse/tubmleweed multiplatform docker image supports the following
> > > > > > platforms:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > aarch64
> > > > > > armv6l
> > > > > > i586
> > > > > > ppc64le
> > > > > > x86_64
> > > > > >
> > > > > > However, armv7l is missed for some reason. How could we get it back?
> > > > >
> > > > > The docker registry only knows "arm" and "arm64". So armv6l is overwriting armv7hl :/
> > > > >
> > > > > Guillaume and me decided to unpublish armv6l for now until we found a solution.
> > > > >
> > > > > Renaming the image is bad for references, so I guess we need to publish armv6l in a
> > > > > different repository.
> > > > >
> > > > > Fabian, do you have an opinion here?
> > > >
> > > > I remember, that once I saw that correct docker platform names are
> > > > linux/arm/v6 and linux/arm/v7
> > >
> > > you mean having it in a different repository? yes, that was my
> > > proposal as well.
> >
> > No, I mean docker platform names. Look here:
> >
> > https://www.docker.com/blog/getting-started-with-docker-for-arm-on-linux/
> >
> > Docker people use "Platform: linux/arm64" for aarch64 and "Platform:
> > linux/arm/v7" for armv7.
>
> Hm, can you find a real life example in any registry?
>

> docker run mplatform/mquery postgres
Image: postgres
 * Manifest List: Yes
 * Supported platforms:
   - linux/amd64
   - linux/arm/v5
   - linux/arm/v7
   - linux/arm64
   - linux/386
   - linux/ppc64le
   - linux/s390x

> docker run mplatform/mquery ubuntu
Image: ubuntu
 * Manifest List: Yes
 * Supported platforms:
   - linux/amd64
   - linux/arm/v7
   - linux/arm64
   - linux/386
   - linux/ppc64le
   - linux/s390x

> I like to look at the manifest, because I have no clue atm how this platform string
> is stored there. It should look like
>
>          "platform" : {
>             "architecture" : "amd64",
>             "os" : "linux"
>          }
>
> but architecture is limited to "Go" architectures which only knows "arm"...
>
> They may (mis)use the version string for this?
>
> Maybe an option...
>
> --
>
> Adrian Schroeter 
> Build Infrastructure Project Manager
>
> SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH,  Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nuernberg, Germany
> (HRB 247165, AG München), Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer
>
>
>
>


-- 
With best regards,
Matwey V. Kornilov
-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-arm+unsubscribe@opensuse.org
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-arm+owner@opensuse.org

Matwey V. Kornilov

08:37

чт, 6 февр. 2020 г. в 11:32, Matwey V. Kornilov :
>
> чт, 6 февр. 2020 г. в 11:27, Adrian Schröter :
> >
> > On Donnerstag, 6. Februar 2020, 09:17:49 CET Matwey V. Kornilov wrote:
> > > чт, 6 февр. 2020 г. в 11:15, Adrian Schröter :
> > > >
> > > > On Donnerstag, 6. Februar 2020, 09:13:24 CET Matwey V. Kornilov wrote:
> > > > > чт, 6 февр. 2020 г. в 11:12, Adrian Schröter :
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mittwoch, 5. Februar 2020, 18:07:56 CET Matwey V. Kornilov wrote:
> > > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Here (https://registry.opensuse.org/cgi-bin/cooverview ) I see that
> > > > > > > opensuse/tubmleweed multiplatform docker image supports the following
> > > > > > > platforms:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > aarch64
> > > > > > > armv6l
> > > > > > > i586
> > > > > > > ppc64le
> > > > > > > x86_64
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > However, armv7l is missed for some reason. How could we get it back?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The docker registry only knows "arm" and "arm64". So armv6l is overwriting armv7hl :/
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Guillaume and me decided to unpublish armv6l for now until we found a solution.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Renaming the image is bad for references, so I guess we need to publish armv6l in a
> > > > > > different repository.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Fabian, do you have an opinion here?
> > > > >
> > > > > I remember, that once I saw that correct docker platform names are
> > > > > linux/arm/v6 and linux/arm/v7
> > > >
> > > > you mean having it in a different repository? yes, that was my
> > > > proposal as well.
> > >
> > > No, I mean docker platform names. Look here:
> > >
> > > https://www.docker.com/blog/getting-started-with-docker-for-arm-on-linux/
> > >
> > > Docker people use "Platform: linux/arm64" for aarch64 and "Platform:
> > > linux/arm/v7" for armv7.
> >
> > Hm, can you find a real life example in any registry?
> >
>
> > docker run mplatform/mquery postgres
> Image: postgres
>  * Manifest List: Yes
>  * Supported platforms:
>    - linux/amd64
>    - linux/arm/v5
>    - linux/arm/v7
>    - linux/arm64
>    - linux/386
>    - linux/ppc64le
>    - linux/s390x
>
> > docker run mplatform/mquery ubuntu
> Image: ubuntu
>  * Manifest List: Yes
>  * Supported platforms:
>    - linux/amd64
>    - linux/arm/v7
>    - linux/arm64
>    - linux/386
>    - linux/ppc64le
>    - linux/s390x
>

I am sorry. You are right here. It seems that "v7" after "arm" is a
"variant" not "architecture":

         "platform": {
            "architecture": "arm",
            "os": "linux",
            "variant": "v7"
         }

However, as a user, I anyway have to use the full platform specification string:

docker run --platform=linux/arm/v7

> > I like to look at the manifest, because I have no clue atm how this platform string
> > is stored there. It should look like
> >
> >          "platform" : {
> >             "architecture" : "amd64",
> >             "os" : "linux"
> >          }
> >
> > but architecture is limited to "Go" architectures which only knows "arm"...
> >
> > They may (mis)use the version string for this?
> >
> > Maybe an option...
> >
> > --
> >
> > Adrian Schroeter 
> > Build Infrastructure Project Manager
> >
> > SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH,  Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nuernberg, Germany
> > (HRB 247165, AG München), Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> With best regards,
> Matwey V. Kornilov



-- 
With best regards,
Matwey V. Kornilov
-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-arm+unsubscribe@opensuse.org
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-arm+owner@opensuse.org

1551

Age (days ago)

1552

Last active (days ago)

List overview

Download

8 comments

2 participants

participants (2)

Adrian Schröter
Matwey V. Kornilov

[opensuse-arm] armv7l platform is missed for docker registry.opensuse.org/opensuse/tumbleweed:latest

tags

participants (2)