Hi, Le 24/04/2015 09:44, Marcus Meissner a écrit :

Hi,

I did a new link and removed the old one.

Thanks.

FWIW, why don't you build these out of just one .spec file and generate multiple binary RPMs?

The spec file is always the same apparently.

No, it is similar to kernel builds : same sources, but various patches, different configs. Moreover, binaries produced may be named identically. Guillaume

Ciao, Marcus On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 09:35:33AM +0200, Guillaume Gardet wrote:

...

Hi,

Ping...

Guillaume

Le 17/04/2015 09:48, Guillaume Gardet a écrit :

...

Hi,

I have updated u-boot to latest stable (2015.04) in Base:System but I need an admin to rename package u-boot-colibrit20iris to u-boot-colibrit20 to follow upstream which renamed colibri_t20_iris_defconfig to colibri_t20_defconfig.

Guillaume

-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-arm+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-arm+owner@opensuse.org

Le 28/04/2015 17:49, Dirk Müller a écrit :

Hi Guillaume, *,

...

No, it is similar to kernel builds : same sources, but various patches, different configs. Moreover, binaries produced may be named identically. Right. Personally I think the best solution would be to move the devel project for u-boot to devel:ARM:Factory and give Guillaume project level access there (I think he has it already, need to double check). The only non-arm thing is u-boot-tools which shouldn't be a big issue (we should still be allowed to set the devel for that to ARM:Factory, even though it is a non-ARM package).

The stop-gap solution is the reviewer part that we just implemented for now, perhaps that helps already.

Adding new boards or renaming boards should not happen too often, so I think we should keep it in Base:System and not use another devel project. Guillaume -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-arm+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-arm+owner@opensuse.org