[opensuse-arm] u-boot supported boards cleanup
Hi, I think there are at least 2 boards built as u-boot RPMs, which may be no more used (no 13.2/Facotry JeOS images are currently using it): * mx53loco * colibri_t20_iris Is there anyone still using those u-boot RPM or having boards to test some images? Guillaume -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-arm+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-arm+owner@opensuse.org
On 19.11.14 16:02, Guillaume Gardet wrote:
Hi,
I think there are at least 2 boards built as u-boot RPMs, which may be no more used (no 13.2/Facotry JeOS images are currently using it): * mx53loco * colibri_t20_iris
Is there anyone still using those u-boot RPM or having boards to test some images?
I have an i.MX53loco that I haven't tested with 13.2 yet :(. If I'm the only one with such a board, I wouldn't mind to drop support for it though. Alex -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-arm+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-arm+owner@opensuse.org
Le 19/11/2014 16:03, Alexander Graf a écrit :
On 19.11.14 16:02, Guillaume Gardet wrote:
Hi,
I think there are at least 2 boards built as u-boot RPMs, which may be no more used (no 13.2/Facotry JeOS images are currently using it): * mx53loco * colibri_t20_iris
Is there anyone still using those u-boot RPM or having boards to test some images? I have an i.MX53loco that I haven't tested with 13.2 yet :(. If I'm the only one with such a board, I wouldn't mind to drop support for it though.
I think we should keep it if someone (you?) can test it some time. I guess we have users which are not on -arm ML. Could you try JeOS-loco from Factory, please? Guillaume -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-arm+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-arm+owner@opensuse.org
Am 19.11.2014 um 16:14 schrieb Guillaume Gardet:
Le 19/11/2014 16:03, Alexander Graf a écrit :
Hi,
I think there are at least 2 boards built as u-boot RPMs, which may be no more used (no 13.2/Facotry JeOS images are currently using it): * mx53loco * colibri_t20_iris
Is there anyone still using those u-boot RPM or having boards to test some images? I have an i.MX53loco that I haven't tested with 13.2 yet :(. If I'm the only one with such a board, I wouldn't mind to drop support for it
On 19.11.14 16:02, Guillaume Gardet wrote: though.
I think we should keep it if someone (you?) can test it some time. I guess we have users which are not on -arm ML.
Could you try JeOS-loco from Factory, please?
There is no requirement to have JeOS images. Please don't drop the Colibri. There's even more Tegra targets that I should look into enabling (e.g., jetson-tk1) but the day only has so many hours... Thanks, Andreas -- SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 21284 AG Nürnberg -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-arm+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-arm+owner@opensuse.org
Le 19/11/2014 16:34, Andreas Färber a écrit :
Am 19.11.2014 um 16:14 schrieb Guillaume Gardet:
Le 19/11/2014 16:03, Alexander Graf a écrit :
Hi,
I think there are at least 2 boards built as u-boot RPMs, which may be no more used (no 13.2/Facotry JeOS images are currently using it): * mx53loco * colibri_t20_iris
Is there anyone still using those u-boot RPM or having boards to test some images? I have an i.MX53loco that I haven't tested with 13.2 yet :(. If I'm the only one with such a board, I wouldn't mind to drop support for it
On 19.11.14 16:02, Guillaume Gardet wrote: though. I think we should keep it if someone (you?) can test it some time. I guess we have users which are not on -arm ML.
Could you try JeOS-loco from Factory, please? There is no requirement to have JeOS images.
If we have no JeOS image using a given u-boot, then there are very little chances that it is used at all. If we have a JeOS image, then we are sure it is in use.
Please don't drop the Colibri. There's even more Tegra targets that I should look into enabling (e.g., jetson-tk1) but the day only has so many hours...
Ok, no problem. :) Guillaume -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-arm+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-arm+owner@opensuse.org
On 19.11.14 16:14, Guillaume Gardet wrote:
Le 19/11/2014 16:03, Alexander Graf a écrit :
Hi,
I think there are at least 2 boards built as u-boot RPMs, which may be no more used (no 13.2/Facotry JeOS images are currently using it): * mx53loco * colibri_t20_iris
Is there anyone still using those u-boot RPM or having boards to test some images? I have an i.MX53loco that I haven't tested with 13.2 yet :(. If I'm the only one with such a board, I wouldn't mind to drop support for it
On 19.11.14 16:02, Guillaume Gardet wrote: though.
I think we should keep it if someone (you?) can test it some time. I guess we have users which are not on -arm ML.
Could you try JeOS-loco from Factory, please?
A quick first run gave this on first boot. I guess we need a patch to enable bootz support? Alex Loading file "boot.scr" from mmc device 0:1 (xxa1) 2287 bytes read Running bootscript from mmc ... ## Executing script at 70800000 mmc0 is current device Loading file "boot/linux.vmx" from mmc device 0:1 (xxa1) 6226376 bytes read Loading file "boot/initrd.uboot" from mmc device 0:1 (xxa1) 48480666 bytes read Loading file "dtb/imx53-qsb.dtb" from mmc device 0:1 (xxa1) 24784 bytes read Unknown command 'bootz' - try 'help' MMC: no card present mmc1(part 0) is current device ** Bad partition 1 ** MX53LOCO U-Boot > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-arm+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-arm+owner@opensuse.org
Le 19/11/2014 17:34, Alexander Graf a écrit :
On 19.11.14 16:14, Guillaume Gardet wrote:
Le 19/11/2014 16:03, Alexander Graf a écrit :
Hi,
I think there are at least 2 boards built as u-boot RPMs, which may be no more used (no 13.2/Facotry JeOS images are currently using it): * mx53loco * colibri_t20_iris
Is there anyone still using those u-boot RPM or having boards to test some images? I have an i.MX53loco that I haven't tested with 13.2 yet :(. If I'm the only one with such a board, I wouldn't mind to drop support for it
On 19.11.14 16:02, Guillaume Gardet wrote: though. I think we should keep it if someone (you?) can test it some time. I guess we have users which are not on -arm ML.
Could you try JeOS-loco from Factory, please? A quick first run gave this on first boot. I guess we need a patch to enable bootz support?
I think so. I will prepare a patch to include bootz. Guillaume -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-arm+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-arm+owner@opensuse.org
Le 19/11/2014 17:36, Guillaume Gardet a écrit :
Le 19/11/2014 17:34, Alexander Graf a écrit :
On 19.11.14 16:14, Guillaume Gardet wrote:
Le 19/11/2014 16:03, Alexander Graf a écrit :
Hi,
I think there are at least 2 boards built as u-boot RPMs, which may be no more used (no 13.2/Facotry JeOS images are currently using it): * mx53loco * colibri_t20_iris
Is there anyone still using those u-boot RPM or having boards to test some images? I have an i.MX53loco that I haven't tested with 13.2 yet :(. If I'm the only one with such a board, I wouldn't mind to drop support for it
On 19.11.14 16:02, Guillaume Gardet wrote: though. I think we should keep it if someone (you?) can test it some time. I guess we have users which are not on -arm ML.
Could you try JeOS-loco from Factory, please? A quick first run gave this on first boot. I guess we need a patch to enable bootz support?
I think so. I will prepare a patch to include bootz.
bootz should already be included (upstream). Which u-boot version is it? Guillaume -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-arm+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-arm+owner@opensuse.org
On 19.11.14 17:42, Guillaume Gardet wrote:
Le 19/11/2014 17:36, Guillaume Gardet a écrit :
Le 19/11/2014 17:34, Alexander Graf a écrit :
On 19.11.14 16:14, Guillaume Gardet wrote:
Le 19/11/2014 16:03, Alexander Graf a écrit :
Hi,
I think there are at least 2 boards built as u-boot RPMs, which may be no more used (no 13.2/Facotry JeOS images are currently using it): * mx53loco * colibri_t20_iris
Is there anyone still using those u-boot RPM or having boards to test some images? I have an i.MX53loco that I haven't tested with 13.2 yet :(. If I'm
On 19.11.14 16:02, Guillaume Gardet wrote: the only one with such a board, I wouldn't mind to drop support for it though. I think we should keep it if someone (you?) can test it some time. I guess we have users which are not on -arm ML.
Could you try JeOS-loco from Factory, please? A quick first run gave this on first boot. I guess we need a patch to enable bootz support?
I think so. I will prepare a patch to include bootz.
bootz should already be included (upstream). Which u-boot version is it?
MX53LOCO U-Boot > version U-Boot 2012.04.01 (Jun 29 2013 - 20:41:16) gcc (SUSE Linux) 4.7.3 GNU ld (GNU Binutils; openSUSE Factory) 2.23.2 --- Wow, that sounds ancient O_o. I used the image "openSUSE-Factory-ARM-JeOS-loco.armv7l-1.12.1-Build238.1.raw.xz". Alex -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-arm+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-arm+owner@opensuse.org
On 19.11.14 17:46, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 19.11.14 17:42, Guillaume Gardet wrote:
Le 19/11/2014 17:36, Guillaume Gardet a écrit :
Le 19/11/2014 17:34, Alexander Graf a écrit :
On 19.11.14 16:14, Guillaume Gardet wrote:
Le 19/11/2014 16:03, Alexander Graf a écrit :
On 19.11.14 16:02, Guillaume Gardet wrote: > Hi, > > I think there are at least 2 boards built as u-boot RPMs, which > may be > no more used (no 13.2/Facotry JeOS images are currently using it): > * mx53loco > * colibri_t20_iris > > Is there anyone still using those u-boot RPM or having boards to test > some images? I have an i.MX53loco that I haven't tested with 13.2 yet :(. If I'm the only one with such a board, I wouldn't mind to drop support for it though. I think we should keep it if someone (you?) can test it some time. I guess we have users which are not on -arm ML.
Could you try JeOS-loco from Factory, please? A quick first run gave this on first boot. I guess we need a patch to enable bootz support?
I think so. I will prepare a patch to include bootz.
bootz should already be included (upstream). Which u-boot version is it?
MX53LOCO U-Boot > version
U-Boot 2012.04.01 (Jun 29 2013 - 20:41:16) gcc (SUSE Linux) 4.7.3 GNU ld (GNU Binutils; openSUSE Factory) 2.23.2
---
Wow, that sounds ancient O_o. I used the image "openSUSE-Factory-ARM-JeOS-loco.armv7l-1.12.1-Build238.1.raw.xz".
This is what the build log says: [ 224s] Retrieving package u-boot-mx53loco-2012.04.01-1.1.armv7hl (1/186), 158.1 KiB (426.5 KiB unpacked) [ 224s] ( 1/186) Installing: u-boot-mx53loco-2012.04.01-1.1 [..........done] [ 224s] Additional rpm output: [ 224s] warning: /var/cache/kiwi/packages/usr_src_packages_SOURCES_repos_devel:ARM:Factory:Contrib:IMX53_standard/u-boot-mx53loco.rpm: Header V3 RSA/SHA1 Signature, key ID 3f546f34: NOKEY So I guess we should remove the Contrib? ;) Alex -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-arm+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-arm+owner@opensuse.org
On 19.11.14 17:49, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 19.11.14 17:46, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 19.11.14 17:42, Guillaume Gardet wrote:
Le 19/11/2014 17:36, Guillaume Gardet a écrit :
Le 19/11/2014 17:34, Alexander Graf a écrit :
On 19.11.14 16:14, Guillaume Gardet wrote:
Le 19/11/2014 16:03, Alexander Graf a écrit : > On 19.11.14 16:02, Guillaume Gardet wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I think there are at least 2 boards built as u-boot RPMs, which >> may be >> no more used (no 13.2/Facotry JeOS images are currently using it): >> * mx53loco >> * colibri_t20_iris >> >> Is there anyone still using those u-boot RPM or having boards to test >> some images? > I have an i.MX53loco that I haven't tested with 13.2 yet :(. If I'm > the > only one with such a board, I wouldn't mind to drop support for it > though. I think we should keep it if someone (you?) can test it some time. I guess we have users which are not on -arm ML.
Could you try JeOS-loco from Factory, please? A quick first run gave this on first boot. I guess we need a patch to enable bootz support?
I think so. I will prepare a patch to include bootz.
bootz should already be included (upstream). Which u-boot version is it?
MX53LOCO U-Boot > version
U-Boot 2012.04.01 (Jun 29 2013 - 20:41:16) gcc (SUSE Linux) 4.7.3 GNU ld (GNU Binutils; openSUSE Factory) 2.23.2
---
Wow, that sounds ancient O_o. I used the image "openSUSE-Factory-ARM-JeOS-loco.armv7l-1.12.1-Build238.1.raw.xz".
This is what the build log says:
[ 224s] Retrieving package u-boot-mx53loco-2012.04.01-1.1.armv7hl (1/186), 158.1 KiB (426.5 KiB unpacked) [ 224s] ( 1/186) Installing: u-boot-mx53loco-2012.04.01-1.1 [..........done] [ 224s] Additional rpm output: [ 224s] warning: /var/cache/kiwi/packages/usr_src_packages_SOURCES_repos_devel:ARM:Factory:Contrib:IMX53_standard/u-boot-mx53loco.rpm: Header V3 RSA/SHA1 Signature, key ID 3f546f34: NOKEY
So I guess we should remove the Contrib? ;)
Ok, I removed the contrib and all links to it in the JeOS package. Alex -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-arm+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-arm+owner@opensuse.org
Le 19/11/2014 17:52, Alexander Graf a écrit :
On 19.11.14 17:49, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 19.11.14 17:46, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 19.11.14 17:42, Guillaume Gardet wrote:
Le 19/11/2014 17:36, Guillaume Gardet a écrit :
Le 19/11/2014 17:34, Alexander Graf a écrit :
On 19.11.14 16:14, Guillaume Gardet wrote: > Le 19/11/2014 16:03, Alexander Graf a écrit : >> On 19.11.14 16:02, Guillaume Gardet wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I think there are at least 2 boards built as u-boot RPMs, which >>> may be >>> no more used (no 13.2/Facotry JeOS images are currently using it): >>> * mx53loco >>> * colibri_t20_iris >>> >>> Is there anyone still using those u-boot RPM or having boards to test >>> some images? >> I have an i.MX53loco that I haven't tested with 13.2 yet :(. If I'm >> the >> only one with such a board, I wouldn't mind to drop support for it >> though. > I think we should keep it if someone (you?) can test it some time. I > guess we have users which are not on -arm ML. > > Could you try JeOS-loco from Factory, please? A quick first run gave this on first boot. I guess we need a patch to enable bootz support? I think so. I will prepare a patch to include bootz. bootz should already be included (upstream). Which u-boot version is it? MX53LOCO U-Boot > version
U-Boot 2012.04.01 (Jun 29 2013 - 20:41:16) gcc (SUSE Linux) 4.7.3 GNU ld (GNU Binutils; openSUSE Factory) 2.23.2
---
Wow, that sounds ancient O_o. I used the image "openSUSE-Factory-ARM-JeOS-loco.armv7l-1.12.1-Build238.1.raw.xz".
This is what the build log says:
[ 224s] Retrieving package u-boot-mx53loco-2012.04.01-1.1.armv7hl (1/186), 158.1 KiB (426.5 KiB unpacked) [ 224s] ( 1/186) Installing: u-boot-mx53loco-2012.04.01-1.1 [..........done] [ 224s] Additional rpm output: [ 224s] warning: /var/cache/kiwi/packages/usr_src_packages_SOURCES_repos_devel:ARM:Factory:Contrib:IMX53_standard/u-boot-mx53loco.rpm: Header V3 RSA/SHA1 Signature, key ID 3f546f34: NOKEY
So I guess we should remove the Contrib? ;)
Ok, I removed the contrib and all links to it in the JeOS package.
Good catch. :) Lets see how things go once rebuilt. Guillaume -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-arm+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-arm+owner@opensuse.org
On 19.11.14 17:56, Guillaume Gardet wrote:
Le 19/11/2014 17:52, Alexander Graf a écrit :
On 19.11.14 17:49, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 19.11.14 17:46, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 19.11.14 17:42, Guillaume Gardet wrote:
Le 19/11/2014 17:36, Guillaume Gardet a écrit :
Le 19/11/2014 17:34, Alexander Graf a écrit : > On 19.11.14 16:14, Guillaume Gardet wrote: >> Le 19/11/2014 16:03, Alexander Graf a écrit : >>> On 19.11.14 16:02, Guillaume Gardet wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I think there are at least 2 boards built as u-boot RPMs, which >>>> may be >>>> no more used (no 13.2/Facotry JeOS images are currently using >>>> it): >>>> * mx53loco >>>> * colibri_t20_iris >>>> >>>> Is there anyone still using those u-boot RPM or having boards >>>> to test >>>> some images? >>> I have an i.MX53loco that I haven't tested with 13.2 yet :(. If >>> I'm >>> the >>> only one with such a board, I wouldn't mind to drop support for it >>> though. >> I think we should keep it if someone (you?) can test it some >> time. I >> guess we have users which are not on -arm ML. >> >> Could you try JeOS-loco from Factory, please? > A quick first run gave this on first boot. I guess we need a > patch to > enable bootz support? I think so. I will prepare a patch to include bootz. bootz should already be included (upstream). Which u-boot version is it? MX53LOCO U-Boot > version
U-Boot 2012.04.01 (Jun 29 2013 - 20:41:16) gcc (SUSE Linux) 4.7.3 GNU ld (GNU Binutils; openSUSE Factory) 2.23.2
---
Wow, that sounds ancient O_o. I used the image "openSUSE-Factory-ARM-JeOS-loco.armv7l-1.12.1-Build238.1.raw.xz".
This is what the build log says:
[ 224s] Retrieving package u-boot-mx53loco-2012.04.01-1.1.armv7hl (1/186), 158.1 KiB (426.5 KiB unpacked) [ 224s] ( 1/186) Installing: u-boot-mx53loco-2012.04.01-1.1 [..........done] [ 224s] Additional rpm output: [ 224s] warning: /var/cache/kiwi/packages/usr_src_packages_SOURCES_repos_devel:ARM:Factory:Contrib:IMX53_standard/u-boot-mx53loco.rpm:
Header V3 RSA/SHA1 Signature, key ID 3f546f34: NOKEY
So I guess we should remove the Contrib? ;)
Ok, I removed the contrib and all links to it in the JeOS package.
Good catch. :)
Lets see how things go once rebuilt.
Wow, that u-boot tries to boot from network? That doesn't sound right. U-Boot 2015.01-rc1 (Nov 13 2014 - 08:59:27) Board: MX53 LOCO I2C: ready DRAM: 1 GiB MMC: FSL_SDHC: 0, FSL_SDHC: 1 *** Warning - bad CRC, using default environment In: serial Out: serial Err: serial Net: FEC Hit any key to stop autoboot: 0 switch to partitions #0, OK mmc0 is current device Unknown command 'load' - try 'help' Unknown command 'load' - try 'help' Booting from net ... BOOTP broadcast 1 BOOTP broadcast 2 BOOTP broadcast 3 BOOTP broadcast 4 DHCP client bound to address 192.168.178.60 (3002 ms) Using FEC device TFTP from server 192.168.178.201; our IP address is 192.168.178.60 Filename 'zImage'. Load address: 0x72000000 Loading: T T T T T T T T Alex -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-arm+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-arm+owner@opensuse.org
On 19.11.14 20:21, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 19.11.14 17:56, Guillaume Gardet wrote:
Le 19/11/2014 17:52, Alexander Graf a écrit :
On 19.11.14 17:49, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 19.11.14 17:46, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 19.11.14 17:42, Guillaume Gardet wrote:
Le 19/11/2014 17:36, Guillaume Gardet a écrit : > Le 19/11/2014 17:34, Alexander Graf a écrit : >> On 19.11.14 16:14, Guillaume Gardet wrote: >>> Le 19/11/2014 16:03, Alexander Graf a écrit : >>>> On 19.11.14 16:02, Guillaume Gardet wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> I think there are at least 2 boards built as u-boot RPMs, which >>>>> may be >>>>> no more used (no 13.2/Facotry JeOS images are currently using >>>>> it): >>>>> * mx53loco >>>>> * colibri_t20_iris >>>>> >>>>> Is there anyone still using those u-boot RPM or having boards >>>>> to test >>>>> some images? >>>> I have an i.MX53loco that I haven't tested with 13.2 yet :(. If >>>> I'm >>>> the >>>> only one with such a board, I wouldn't mind to drop support for it >>>> though. >>> I think we should keep it if someone (you?) can test it some >>> time. I >>> guess we have users which are not on -arm ML. >>> >>> Could you try JeOS-loco from Factory, please? >> A quick first run gave this on first boot. I guess we need a >> patch to >> enable bootz support? > I think so. I will prepare a patch to include bootz. bootz should already be included (upstream). Which u-boot version is it? MX53LOCO U-Boot > version
U-Boot 2012.04.01 (Jun 29 2013 - 20:41:16) gcc (SUSE Linux) 4.7.3 GNU ld (GNU Binutils; openSUSE Factory) 2.23.2
---
Wow, that sounds ancient O_o. I used the image "openSUSE-Factory-ARM-JeOS-loco.armv7l-1.12.1-Build238.1.raw.xz".
This is what the build log says:
[ 224s] Retrieving package u-boot-mx53loco-2012.04.01-1.1.armv7hl (1/186), 158.1 KiB (426.5 KiB unpacked) [ 224s] ( 1/186) Installing: u-boot-mx53loco-2012.04.01-1.1 [..........done] [ 224s] Additional rpm output: [ 224s] warning: /var/cache/kiwi/packages/usr_src_packages_SOURCES_repos_devel:ARM:Factory:Contrib:IMX53_standard/u-boot-mx53loco.rpm:
Header V3 RSA/SHA1 Signature, key ID 3f546f34: NOKEY
So I guess we should remove the Contrib? ;)
Ok, I removed the contrib and all links to it in the JeOS package.
Good catch. :)
Lets see how things go once rebuilt.
Wow, that u-boot tries to boot from network? That doesn't sound right.
Thanks, with your fixed u-boot I can successfully boot: Welcome to openSUSE Factory "Harlequin" - Kernel 3.17.2-1-default (ttymxc0). linux login: root Password: Have a lot of fun... linux:~ # cat /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 model name : ARMv7 Processor rev 5 (v7l) Features : half thumb fastmult vfp edsp thumbee neon vfpv3 tls vfpd32 CPU implementer : 0x41 CPU architecture: 7 CPU variant : 0x2 CPU part : 0xc08 CPU revision : 5 Hardware : Freescale i.MX53 (Device Tree Support) Revision : 0000 Serial : 0000000000000000 Alex -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-arm+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-arm+owner@opensuse.org
Le 19/11/2014 22:26, Alexander Graf a écrit :
On 19.11.14 20:21, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 19.11.14 17:56, Guillaume Gardet wrote:
Le 19/11/2014 17:52, Alexander Graf a écrit :
On 19.11.14 17:49, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 19.11.14 17:46, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 19.11.14 17:42, Guillaume Gardet wrote: > Le 19/11/2014 17:36, Guillaume Gardet a écrit : >> Le 19/11/2014 17:34, Alexander Graf a écrit : >>> On 19.11.14 16:14, Guillaume Gardet wrote: >>>> Le 19/11/2014 16:03, Alexander Graf a écrit : >>>>> On 19.11.14 16:02, Guillaume Gardet wrote: >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> I think there are at least 2 boards built as u-boot RPMs, which >>>>>> may be >>>>>> no more used (no 13.2/Facotry JeOS images are currently using >>>>>> it): >>>>>> * mx53loco >>>>>> * colibri_t20_iris >>>>>> >>>>>> Is there anyone still using those u-boot RPM or having boards >>>>>> to test >>>>>> some images? >>>>> I have an i.MX53loco that I haven't tested with 13.2 yet :(. If >>>>> I'm >>>>> the >>>>> only one with such a board, I wouldn't mind to drop support for it >>>>> though. >>>> I think we should keep it if someone (you?) can test it some >>>> time. I >>>> guess we have users which are not on -arm ML. >>>> >>>> Could you try JeOS-loco from Factory, please? >>> A quick first run gave this on first boot. I guess we need a >>> patch to >>> enable bootz support? >> I think so. I will prepare a patch to include bootz. > bootz should already be included (upstream). Which u-boot version > is it? MX53LOCO U-Boot > version
U-Boot 2012.04.01 (Jun 29 2013 - 20:41:16) gcc (SUSE Linux) 4.7.3 GNU ld (GNU Binutils; openSUSE Factory) 2.23.2
---
Wow, that sounds ancient O_o. I used the image "openSUSE-Factory-ARM-JeOS-loco.armv7l-1.12.1-Build238.1.raw.xz". This is what the build log says:
[ 224s] Retrieving package u-boot-mx53loco-2012.04.01-1.1.armv7hl (1/186), 158.1 KiB (426.5 KiB unpacked) [ 224s] ( 1/186) Installing: u-boot-mx53loco-2012.04.01-1.1 [..........done] [ 224s] Additional rpm output: [ 224s] warning: /var/cache/kiwi/packages/usr_src_packages_SOURCES_repos_devel:ARM:Factory:Contrib:IMX53_standard/u-boot-mx53loco.rpm:
Header V3 RSA/SHA1 Signature, key ID 3f546f34: NOKEY
So I guess we should remove the Contrib? ;) Ok, I removed the contrib and all links to it in the JeOS package. Good catch. :)
Lets see how things go once rebuilt. Wow, that u-boot tries to boot from network? That doesn't sound right.
Thanks, with your fixed u-boot I can successfully boot:
Perfect. :) Thanks for testing. Fixed u-boot is on the way to Factory. Should we enable JeOS-loco for 13.2? If yes, we would need updated u-boot from Base:System repo. Guillaume -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-arm+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-arm+owner@opensuse.org
Am 20.11.2014 um 09:08 schrieb Guillaume Gardet <guillaume.gardet@free.fr>:
Le 19/11/2014 22:26, Alexander Graf a écrit :
On 19.11.14 20:21, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 19.11.14 17:56, Guillaume Gardet wrote: Le 19/11/2014 17:52, Alexander Graf a écrit :
On 19.11.14 17:49, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 19.11.14 17:46, Alexander Graf wrote: > On 19.11.14 17:42, Guillaume Gardet wrote: >> Le 19/11/2014 17:36, Guillaume Gardet a écrit : >>> Le 19/11/2014 17:34, Alexander Graf a écrit : >>>> On 19.11.14 16:14, Guillaume Gardet wrote: >>>>> Le 19/11/2014 16:03, Alexander Graf a écrit : >>>>>>> On 19.11.14 16:02, Guillaume Gardet wrote: >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I think there are at least 2 boards built as u-boot RPMs, which >>>>>>> may be >>>>>>> no more used (no 13.2/Facotry JeOS images are currently using >>>>>>> it): >>>>>>> * mx53loco >>>>>>> * colibri_t20_iris >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Is there anyone still using those u-boot RPM or having boards >>>>>>> to test >>>>>>> some images? >>>>>> I have an i.MX53loco that I haven't tested with 13.2 yet :(. If >>>>>> I'm >>>>>> the >>>>>> only one with such a board, I wouldn't mind to drop support for it >>>>>> though. >>>>> I think we should keep it if someone (you?) can test it some >>>>> time. I >>>>> guess we have users which are not on -arm ML. >>>>> >>>>> Could you try JeOS-loco from Factory, please? >>>> A quick first run gave this on first boot. I guess we need a >>>> patch to >>>> enable bootz support? >>> I think so. I will prepare a patch to include bootz. >> bootz should already be included (upstream). Which u-boot version >> is it? > MX53LOCO U-Boot > version > > U-Boot 2012.04.01 (Jun 29 2013 - 20:41:16) > gcc (SUSE Linux) 4.7.3 > GNU ld (GNU Binutils; openSUSE Factory) 2.23.2 > > --- > > Wow, that sounds ancient O_o. I used the image > "openSUSE-Factory-ARM-JeOS-loco.armv7l-1.12.1-Build238.1.raw.xz". This is what the build log says:
[ 224s] Retrieving package u-boot-mx53loco-2012.04.01-1.1.armv7hl (1/186), 158.1 KiB (426.5 KiB unpacked) [ 224s] ( 1/186) Installing: u-boot-mx53loco-2012.04.01-1.1 [..........done] [ 224s] Additional rpm output: [ 224s] warning: /var/cache/kiwi/packages/usr_src_packages_SOURCES_repos_devel:ARM:Factory:Contrib:IMX53_standard/u-boot-mx53loco.rpm:
Header V3 RSA/SHA1 Signature, key ID 3f546f34: NOKEY
So I guess we should remove the Contrib? ;) Ok, I removed the contrib and all links to it in the JeOS package. Good catch. :)
Lets see how things go once rebuilt. Wow, that u-boot tries to boot from network? That doesn't sound right.
Thanks, with your fixed u-boot I can successfully boot:
Perfect. :) Thanks for testing.
Fixed u-boot is on the way to Factory.
Should we enable JeOS-loco for 13.2? If yes, we would need updated u-boot from Base:System repo.
I think it's unimportant enough to work as a Contrib, I'll just put one up and copy your more recent u-boot into it. Alex -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-arm+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-arm+owner@opensuse.org
Le 20/11/2014 10:33, Alexander Graf a écrit :
Am 20.11.2014 um 09:08 schrieb Guillaume Gardet <guillaume.gardet@free.fr>:
Le 19/11/2014 22:26, Alexander Graf a écrit :
On 19.11.14 20:21, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 19.11.14 17:56, Guillaume Gardet wrote: Le 19/11/2014 17:52, Alexander Graf a écrit :
On 19.11.14 17:49, Alexander Graf wrote: > On 19.11.14 17:46, Alexander Graf wrote: >> On 19.11.14 17:42, Guillaume Gardet wrote: >>> Le 19/11/2014 17:36, Guillaume Gardet a écrit : >>>> Le 19/11/2014 17:34, Alexander Graf a écrit : >>>>> On 19.11.14 16:14, Guillaume Gardet wrote: >>>>>> Le 19/11/2014 16:03, Alexander Graf a écrit : >>>>>>>> On 19.11.14 16:02, Guillaume Gardet wrote: >>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I think there are at least 2 boards built as u-boot RPMs, which >>>>>>>> may be >>>>>>>> no more used (no 13.2/Facotry JeOS images are currently using >>>>>>>> it): >>>>>>>> * mx53loco >>>>>>>> * colibri_t20_iris >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Is there anyone still using those u-boot RPM or having boards >>>>>>>> to test >>>>>>>> some images? >>>>>>> I have an i.MX53loco that I haven't tested with 13.2 yet :(. If >>>>>>> I'm >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> only one with such a board, I wouldn't mind to drop support for it >>>>>>> though. >>>>>> I think we should keep it if someone (you?) can test it some >>>>>> time. I >>>>>> guess we have users which are not on -arm ML. >>>>>> >>>>>> Could you try JeOS-loco from Factory, please? >>>>> A quick first run gave this on first boot. I guess we need a >>>>> patch to >>>>> enable bootz support? >>>> I think so. I will prepare a patch to include bootz. >>> bootz should already be included (upstream). Which u-boot version >>> is it? >> MX53LOCO U-Boot > version >> >> U-Boot 2012.04.01 (Jun 29 2013 - 20:41:16) >> gcc (SUSE Linux) 4.7.3 >> GNU ld (GNU Binutils; openSUSE Factory) 2.23.2 >> >> --- >> >> Wow, that sounds ancient O_o. I used the image >> "openSUSE-Factory-ARM-JeOS-loco.armv7l-1.12.1-Build238.1.raw.xz". > This is what the build log says: > > [ 224s] Retrieving package u-boot-mx53loco-2012.04.01-1.1.armv7hl > (1/186), 158.1 KiB (426.5 KiB unpacked) > [ 224s] ( 1/186) Installing: u-boot-mx53loco-2012.04.01-1.1 > [..........done] > [ 224s] Additional rpm output: > [ 224s] warning: > /var/cache/kiwi/packages/usr_src_packages_SOURCES_repos_devel:ARM:Factory:Contrib:IMX53_standard/u-boot-mx53loco.rpm: > > Header V3 RSA/SHA1 Signature, key ID 3f546f34: NOKEY > > So I guess we should remove the Contrib? ;) Ok, I removed the contrib and all links to it in the JeOS package. Good catch. :)
Lets see how things go once rebuilt. Wow, that u-boot tries to boot from network? That doesn't sound right. Thanks, with your fixed u-boot I can successfully boot: Perfect. :) Thanks for testing.
Fixed u-boot is on the way to Factory.
Should we enable JeOS-loco for 13.2? If yes, we would need updated u-boot from Base:System repo. I think it's unimportant enough to work as a Contrib, I'll just put one up and copy your more recent u-boot into it.
There is already a custom u-boot in 13.2:Ports for cubie* boards. So, you may just update this u-boot and add u-boot-mx53loco link. That way, we could avoid to have another contrib repo. Guillaume -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-arm+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-arm+owner@opensuse.org
On 20.11.14 11:05, Guillaume Gardet wrote:
Le 20/11/2014 10:33, Alexander Graf a écrit :
Am 20.11.2014 um 09:08 schrieb Guillaume Gardet <guillaume.gardet@free.fr>:
Le 19/11/2014 22:26, Alexander Graf a écrit :
On 19.11.14 20:21, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 19.11.14 17:56, Guillaume Gardet wrote: Le 19/11/2014 17:52, Alexander Graf a écrit : > On 19.11.14 17:49, Alexander Graf wrote: >> On 19.11.14 17:46, Alexander Graf wrote: >>> On 19.11.14 17:42, Guillaume Gardet wrote: >>>> Le 19/11/2014 17:36, Guillaume Gardet a écrit : >>>>> Le 19/11/2014 17:34, Alexander Graf a écrit : >>>>>> On 19.11.14 16:14, Guillaume Gardet wrote: >>>>>>> Le 19/11/2014 16:03, Alexander Graf a écrit : >>>>>>>>> On 19.11.14 16:02, Guillaume Gardet wrote: >>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I think there are at least 2 boards built as u-boot RPMs, >>>>>>>>> which >>>>>>>>> may be >>>>>>>>> no more used (no 13.2/Facotry JeOS images are currently >>>>>>>>> using >>>>>>>>> it): >>>>>>>>> * mx53loco >>>>>>>>> * colibri_t20_iris >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Is there anyone still using those u-boot RPM or having >>>>>>>>> boards >>>>>>>>> to test >>>>>>>>> some images? >>>>>>>> I have an i.MX53loco that I haven't tested with 13.2 yet >>>>>>>> :(. If >>>>>>>> I'm >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>> only one with such a board, I wouldn't mind to drop >>>>>>>> support for it >>>>>>>> though. >>>>>>> I think we should keep it if someone (you?) can test it some >>>>>>> time. I >>>>>>> guess we have users which are not on -arm ML. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Could you try JeOS-loco from Factory, please? >>>>>> A quick first run gave this on first boot. I guess we need a >>>>>> patch to >>>>>> enable bootz support? >>>>> I think so. I will prepare a patch to include bootz. >>>> bootz should already be included (upstream). Which u-boot version >>>> is it? >>> MX53LOCO U-Boot > version >>> >>> U-Boot 2012.04.01 (Jun 29 2013 - 20:41:16) >>> gcc (SUSE Linux) 4.7.3 >>> GNU ld (GNU Binutils; openSUSE Factory) 2.23.2 >>> >>> --- >>> >>> Wow, that sounds ancient O_o. I used the image >>> "openSUSE-Factory-ARM-JeOS-loco.armv7l-1.12.1-Build238.1.raw.xz". >> This is what the build log says: >> >> [ 224s] Retrieving package u-boot-mx53loco-2012.04.01-1.1.armv7hl >> (1/186), 158.1 KiB (426.5 KiB unpacked) >> [ 224s] ( 1/186) Installing: u-boot-mx53loco-2012.04.01-1.1 >> [..........done] >> [ 224s] Additional rpm output: >> [ 224s] warning: >> /var/cache/kiwi/packages/usr_src_packages_SOURCES_repos_devel:ARM:Factory:Contrib:IMX53_standard/u-boot-mx53loco.rpm: >> >> >> Header V3 RSA/SHA1 Signature, key ID 3f546f34: NOKEY >> >> So I guess we should remove the Contrib? ;) > Ok, I removed the contrib and all links to it in the JeOS package. Good catch. :)
Lets see how things go once rebuilt. Wow, that u-boot tries to boot from network? That doesn't sound right. Thanks, with your fixed u-boot I can successfully boot: Perfect. :) Thanks for testing.
Fixed u-boot is on the way to Factory.
Should we enable JeOS-loco for 13.2? If yes, we would need updated u-boot from Base:System repo. I think it's unimportant enough to work as a Contrib, I'll just put one up and copy your more recent u-boot into it.
There is already a custom u-boot in 13.2:Ports for cubie* boards. So, you may just update this u-boot and add u-boot-mx53loco link. That way, we could avoid to have another contrib repo.
I don't think we want to move from a stable version of u-boot (2014.10) to an unstable one (2015.01-rc1). So if anything, we should kick off a maintenance update for u-boot on 13.2 and once submitted, copy the updated package into Ports. Alex -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-arm+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-arm+owner@opensuse.org
Le 20/11/2014 13:13, Alexander Graf a écrit :
Le 20/11/2014 10:33, Alexander Graf a écrit :
Am 20.11.2014 um 09:08 schrieb Guillaume Gardet <guillaume.gardet@free.fr>:
Le 19/11/2014 22:26, Alexander Graf a écrit :
On 19.11.14 20:21, Alexander Graf wrote:
> On 19.11.14 17:56, Guillaume Gardet wrote: > Le 19/11/2014 17:52, Alexander Graf a écrit : >> On 19.11.14 17:49, Alexander Graf wrote: >>> On 19.11.14 17:46, Alexander Graf wrote: >>>> On 19.11.14 17:42, Guillaume Gardet wrote: >>>>> Le 19/11/2014 17:36, Guillaume Gardet a écrit : >>>>>> Le 19/11/2014 17:34, Alexander Graf a écrit : >>>>>>> On 19.11.14 16:14, Guillaume Gardet wrote: >>>>>>>> Le 19/11/2014 16:03, Alexander Graf a écrit : >>>>>>>>>> On 19.11.14 16:02, Guillaume Gardet wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I think there are at least 2 boards built as u-boot RPMs, >>>>>>>>>> which >>>>>>>>>> may be >>>>>>>>>> no more used (no 13.2/Facotry JeOS images are currently >>>>>>>>>> using >>>>>>>>>> it): >>>>>>>>>> * mx53loco >>>>>>>>>> * colibri_t20_iris >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Is there anyone still using those u-boot RPM or having >>>>>>>>>> boards >>>>>>>>>> to test >>>>>>>>>> some images? >>>>>>>>> I have an i.MX53loco that I haven't tested with 13.2 yet >>>>>>>>> :(. If >>>>>>>>> I'm >>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>> only one with such a board, I wouldn't mind to drop >>>>>>>>> support for it >>>>>>>>> though. >>>>>>>> I think we should keep it if someone (you?) can test it some >>>>>>>> time. I >>>>>>>> guess we have users which are not on -arm ML. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Could you try JeOS-loco from Factory, please? >>>>>>> A quick first run gave this on first boot. I guess we need a >>>>>>> patch to >>>>>>> enable bootz support? >>>>>> I think so. I will prepare a patch to include bootz. >>>>> bootz should already be included (upstream). Which u-boot version >>>>> is it? >>>> MX53LOCO U-Boot > version >>>> >>>> U-Boot 2012.04.01 (Jun 29 2013 - 20:41:16) >>>> gcc (SUSE Linux) 4.7.3 >>>> GNU ld (GNU Binutils; openSUSE Factory) 2.23.2 >>>> >>>> --- >>>> >>>> Wow, that sounds ancient O_o. I used the image >>>> "openSUSE-Factory-ARM-JeOS-loco.armv7l-1.12.1-Build238.1.raw.xz". >>> This is what the build log says: >>> >>> [ 224s] Retrieving package u-boot-mx53loco-2012.04.01-1.1.armv7hl >>> (1/186), 158.1 KiB (426.5 KiB unpacked) >>> [ 224s] ( 1/186) Installing: u-boot-mx53loco-2012.04.01-1.1 >>> [..........done] >>> [ 224s] Additional rpm output: >>> [ 224s] warning: >>> /var/cache/kiwi/packages/usr_src_packages_SOURCES_repos_devel:ARM:Factory:Contrib:IMX53_standard/u-boot-mx53loco.rpm: >>> >>> >>> Header V3 RSA/SHA1 Signature, key ID 3f546f34: NOKEY >>> >>> So I guess we should remove the Contrib? ;) >> Ok, I removed the contrib and all links to it in the JeOS package. > Good catch. :) > > Lets see how things go once rebuilt. Wow, that u-boot tries to boot from network? That doesn't sound right. Thanks, with your fixed u-boot I can successfully boot: Perfect. :) Thanks for testing.
Fixed u-boot is on the way to Factory.
Should we enable JeOS-loco for 13.2? If yes, we would need updated u-boot from Base:System repo. I think it's unimportant enough to work as a Contrib, I'll just put one up and copy your more recent u-boot into it.
There is already a custom u-boot in 13.2:Ports for cubie* boards. So, you may just update this u-boot and add u-boot-mx53loco link. That way, we could avoid to have another contrib repo. I don't think we want to move from a stable version of u-boot (2014.10) to an unstable one (2015.01-rc1). So if anything, we should kick off a
On 20.11.14 11:05, Guillaume Gardet wrote: maintenance update for u-boot on 13.2 and once submitted, copy the updated package into Ports.
Ok, that's make sense. Guillaume -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-arm+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-arm+owner@opensuse.org
participants (3)
-
Alexander Graf -
Andreas Färber -
Guillaume Gardet