On 5 October 2012 14:20, Adrian Schröter <adrian@suse.de> wrote:
Am Freitag, 5. Oktober 2012, 14:57:16 schrieb Guillaume Gardet: ...
Adrian wanted to switch it to armv5el completely, to get rid of that naming difference. Or at least make a sym link as a workaround. We have currently a broken rpm package on armv5, I bootstrap i currently manually. Afterwards we need to do a clean rebuild, so please do not add workarounds until we tried that.
I hope it solves the problem.
Ok. Ping us when it can be tested.
checking this again, using armv5 without thumb would make us quite special. Debian and Fedora are using both thumb. And ubuntu gave up on v5 at all.
So, I really wonder if the decision to not use thumb on v5 is really the right one or if we should revisit this.
I would say we most certainly DO WANT thumb support. IIRC all v5 implementations have thumb so regardless of what hardware one would use it on it would work. We should avoid doing something different to the others especially as it wouldn't make us better but actually worse. Saying that v5 shouldn't consume cycles if there are issues on v7. -- Andrew Wafaa IRC: FunkyPenguin GPG: 0x3A36312F -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-arm+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-arm+owner@opensuse.org