On 05.10.2012, at 15:20, Adrian Schröter wrote:
Am Freitag, 5. Oktober 2012, 14:57:16 schrieb Guillaume Gardet: ...
Adrian wanted to switch it to armv5el completely, to get rid of that naming difference. Or at least make a sym link as a workaround. We have currently a broken rpm package on armv5, I bootstrap i currently manually. Afterwards we need to do a clean rebuild, so please do not add workarounds until we tried that.
I hope it solves the problem.
Ok. Ping us when it can be tested.
checking this again, using armv5 without thumb would make us quite special. Debian and Fedora are using both thumb. And ubuntu gave up on v5 at all.
So, I really wonder if the decision to not use thumb on v5 is really the right one or if we should revisit this.
I thought thumbv1 (which is what armv5 does) is slower than arm code? Do they actually compile code for thumb? Or do they just say it's tel but run arm code? Alex -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-arm+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-arm+owner@opensuse.org