Am Donnerstag, 27. Juni 2013, 12:15:30 schrieb Dirk Müller:
Hey Guillaume,
ok. What would be the better name: armv6l or armv6hl? Kernel uses armv6l but I guess for us armv6l would be for soft-float and armv6hl for hardfloat? Well, I agree that it is confusing but I made it consistent with armv7hl/armv7l, so it doesn't add an extra layer to the confusions of how to build ARM in the Open Build Service. The RPM distros agreed to use hl for hardfloat distros as a rpm architecture, so I think we should use that one as well (See the same done for e.g. Fedora here: http://japan.proximity.on.ca/koji/).
For reasons that I don't understand/remember, the OBS uses however uname -m, so thats where the armv6l is coming from.
it is not uname -m, it is manual setup decision. But it is the same as the kernel does it (it does not know armv7hl either). We can rename all schedulers to hl, but we should do it consistent. And it is kind of a problem, because we already release a v7l distro.
I think it would be a good idea to get the 12.3 sources built for armv6l (the scheduler) so that you can continue on hacking kiwi+imaging.
Yes. Could you do it for me, please?
I'll need Adrian's powers for that. I'll try to look into it later.
for what? Just setting up a project link using openSUSE:Factory:ARM/standard (containing armv6l) would not work? I thought that is what you wanted the armv7 binaries inside for ? -- Adrian Schroeter email: adrian@suse.de SUSE LINUX GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) Maxfeldstraße 5 90409 Nürnberg Germany -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-arm+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-arm+owner@opensuse.org