Le 05/10/2012 12:27, Alexander Graf a écrit :
On 05.10.2012, at 10:49, Guillaume Gardet <guillaume.gardet@free.fr> wrote:
Le 19/09/2012 12:09, Alexander Graf a écrit :
On 19.09.2012, at 12:07, Bernhard M. Wiedemann wrote:
On 09/17/2012 12:30 PM, Guillaume GARDET wrote:
For armv5, the compiler does not find the file "bits/c++config.h" whereas the package libstdc++47-devel is installed: ********************************************************************************
[ 531s] In file included from /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/qt-everywhere-opensource-src-4.8.2/include/QtCore/../../src/corelib/tools/qlist.h:58:0,
[ 531s] from /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/qt-everywhere-opensource-src-4.8.2/include/QtCore/qlist.h:1,
[ 531s] from /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/qt-everywhere-opensource-src-4.8.2/include/QtCore/../../src/corelib/tools/qstringlist.h:47,
[ 531s] from /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/qt-everywhere-opensource-src-4.8.2/include/QtCore/qstringlist.h:1,
[ 531s] from project.h:45, [ 531s] from option.h:45, [ 531s] from property.cpp:43: [ 531s] /usr/armv5el-suse-linux-gnueabi/usr/include/c++/4.7/new:41:28: fatal error: bits/c++config.h: No such file or directory ********************************************************************************
using strace, I found that the file is searched in
/usr/armv5el-suse-linux-gnueabi/usr/include/c++/4.7/bits/c++config.h /usr/armv5el-suse-linux-gnueabi/usr/include/c++/4.7/backward/bits/c++config.h /usr/lib64/gcc/armv5el-suse-linux-gnueabi/4.7/include/bits/c++config.h /usr/armv5el-suse-linux-gnueabi/usr/local/include/bits/c++config.h /usr/lib64/gcc/armv5el-suse-linux-gnueabi/4.7/include-fixed/bits/c++config.h /usr/armv5el-suse-linux-gnueabi/usr/include/bits/c++config.h
but it really is in /usr/include/c++/4.7/armv5tel-suse-linux-gnueabi/bits/c++config.h Is the armv5el / armv5tel difference on purpose? Does anyone have some ideas to solve the problem? There are more packages affected.
I would like to help, but I do not know which package is faulty. IIRC the problem lies in qemu-accel and the fact that we call it armv5tel, but it really is armv5el (no thumb).
Ok. So, we should not enable thumb for armv5? I thought all armv5 have thumb capabilities.
Adrian wanted to switch it to armv5el completely, to get rid of that naming difference.
Or at least make a sym link as a workaround. Guillaume
Alex
Guillaume
Alex
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-arm+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-arm+owner@opensuse.org