Le 20/11/2014 13:13, Alexander Graf a écrit :
Le 20/11/2014 10:33, Alexander Graf a écrit :
Am 20.11.2014 um 09:08 schrieb Guillaume Gardet <guillaume.gardet@free.fr>:
Le 19/11/2014 22:26, Alexander Graf a écrit :
On 19.11.14 20:21, Alexander Graf wrote:
> On 19.11.14 17:56, Guillaume Gardet wrote: > Le 19/11/2014 17:52, Alexander Graf a écrit : >> On 19.11.14 17:49, Alexander Graf wrote: >>> On 19.11.14 17:46, Alexander Graf wrote: >>>> On 19.11.14 17:42, Guillaume Gardet wrote: >>>>> Le 19/11/2014 17:36, Guillaume Gardet a écrit : >>>>>> Le 19/11/2014 17:34, Alexander Graf a écrit : >>>>>>> On 19.11.14 16:14, Guillaume Gardet wrote: >>>>>>>> Le 19/11/2014 16:03, Alexander Graf a écrit : >>>>>>>>>> On 19.11.14 16:02, Guillaume Gardet wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I think there are at least 2 boards built as u-boot RPMs, >>>>>>>>>> which >>>>>>>>>> may be >>>>>>>>>> no more used (no 13.2/Facotry JeOS images are currently >>>>>>>>>> using >>>>>>>>>> it): >>>>>>>>>> * mx53loco >>>>>>>>>> * colibri_t20_iris >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Is there anyone still using those u-boot RPM or having >>>>>>>>>> boards >>>>>>>>>> to test >>>>>>>>>> some images? >>>>>>>>> I have an i.MX53loco that I haven't tested with 13.2 yet >>>>>>>>> :(. If >>>>>>>>> I'm >>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>> only one with such a board, I wouldn't mind to drop >>>>>>>>> support for it >>>>>>>>> though. >>>>>>>> I think we should keep it if someone (you?) can test it some >>>>>>>> time. I >>>>>>>> guess we have users which are not on -arm ML. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Could you try JeOS-loco from Factory, please? >>>>>>> A quick first run gave this on first boot. I guess we need a >>>>>>> patch to >>>>>>> enable bootz support? >>>>>> I think so. I will prepare a patch to include bootz. >>>>> bootz should already be included (upstream). Which u-boot version >>>>> is it? >>>> MX53LOCO U-Boot > version >>>> >>>> U-Boot 2012.04.01 (Jun 29 2013 - 20:41:16) >>>> gcc (SUSE Linux) 4.7.3 >>>> GNU ld (GNU Binutils; openSUSE Factory) 2.23.2 >>>> >>>> --- >>>> >>>> Wow, that sounds ancient O_o. I used the image >>>> "openSUSE-Factory-ARM-JeOS-loco.armv7l-1.12.1-Build238.1.raw.xz". >>> This is what the build log says: >>> >>> [ 224s] Retrieving package u-boot-mx53loco-2012.04.01-1.1.armv7hl >>> (1/186), 158.1 KiB (426.5 KiB unpacked) >>> [ 224s] ( 1/186) Installing: u-boot-mx53loco-2012.04.01-1.1 >>> [..........done] >>> [ 224s] Additional rpm output: >>> [ 224s] warning: >>> /var/cache/kiwi/packages/usr_src_packages_SOURCES_repos_devel:ARM:Factory:Contrib:IMX53_standard/u-boot-mx53loco.rpm: >>> >>> >>> Header V3 RSA/SHA1 Signature, key ID 3f546f34: NOKEY >>> >>> So I guess we should remove the Contrib? ;) >> Ok, I removed the contrib and all links to it in the JeOS package. > Good catch. :) > > Lets see how things go once rebuilt. Wow, that u-boot tries to boot from network? That doesn't sound right. Thanks, with your fixed u-boot I can successfully boot: Perfect. :) Thanks for testing.
Fixed u-boot is on the way to Factory.
Should we enable JeOS-loco for 13.2? If yes, we would need updated u-boot from Base:System repo. I think it's unimportant enough to work as a Contrib, I'll just put one up and copy your more recent u-boot into it.
There is already a custom u-boot in 13.2:Ports for cubie* boards. So, you may just update this u-boot and add u-boot-mx53loco link. That way, we could avoid to have another contrib repo. I don't think we want to move from a stable version of u-boot (2014.10) to an unstable one (2015.01-rc1). So if anything, we should kick off a
On 20.11.14 11:05, Guillaume Gardet wrote: maintenance update for u-boot on 13.2 and once submitted, copy the updated package into Ports.
Ok, that's make sense. Guillaume -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-arm+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-arm+owner@opensuse.org