I have it. It even said contact suse in the box it came in for tech support. Getting it to run on a amd64 though..... when i goto execute I get the following messages. ./civctp BUG! (Segmentation Fault) Going down hard... CivCTP Linux 1.1 Thu Jun 10 19:51:54 PDT 1999 Built with flags: -O2 -funroll-loops -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -g -D_REENTRANT -DPACK=__attribute__ ((packed)) -DCIV3_SPECIES=75 -D_BFR_ -malign-double -D_SDL_STATIC_LIB -DSTATICALLY_LINKED Built with glibc-2.1 Stack dump: { 0x804b5f0 0xffffe500 0x847136a 0x8470feb 0x8471484 0x83dcd16 0x8470feb 0x83dd024 0x83dccef 0x8048f48 0x818aed6 0x817f33b 0x817e8ea 0x81758b6 0x804dd2c 0x804e85a 0x804ef02 0x82219fc 0x822193f 0x804e560 0x804e766 0x804b8f7 0x84403bd 0x8048111 } Please send a full bug report, along with the contents of autosave to: support@lokigames.com Killed When I try it with linux32 first I get about the same message. ideas? BTW, the program will go through the intro screen. It is only when you click launch that it dies. And if you put an icon on the desktop for program initiation, it will gak your kde. Roy F. Cabaniss http://www.housedraco.org
Hi, I updated the OS of my Opteron cluster from SuSE9.1 to SuSE9.3 ( not New Installation), the installation went smoothly, however, I found that not all original system configurations were kept: 1. I am not able to use rsh among all nodes in the cluster. 2. The NAT server on the master node is no longer working, I am not able to reach computers outside from client nodes. Here are the original configuration: On the master node (140.110.17.10), I included the following llines in file /etc/init.d/boot.local modprobe ip_tables modprobe ip_nat_ftp modprobe ip_nat_irc modprobe ip_conntrack modprobe ip_conntrack_ftp modprobe ip_conntrack_irc iptables -F; iptables -t nat -F iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j SNAT --to 140.110.17.10 echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward And defined the gateway to 192.168.3.100 (the internal IP address of the master node) on all client nodes. On SuSE 9.1, this configuartion works normally. 3. In directory /etc/init.d/rc3.d, nfs always executes earlier than ypbind, regardless the assigned numbers, e.g., S01irq_balancer S01random S03dbus S04boot.udev S05network S06syslog S08portmap S08resmgr S08splach_early S09ypbind S10nfs S11nfsboot S12fbset S12kbd S12running-kernel S12splash S13sshd S13sutofs S13cups S13hwscan S13powersaved S13xinetd S14nscd S14pbs_mom S15cron S16hal During the system boot, my intention is to start ypbind before nfs, but SuSE9.3 always execute nfs before ypbind. 4. If install SuSE9.3 as New Installation, I am not able to enable xinetd with YAST2, many network services (e.g. telnet server) are not available. I realize that SuSE9.3 has changed many system default configurations for security reason, but some of these changes caused above problems. Perhaps someone can give me some hints so I can restore my original environment under SuSE9.3? Thanks. Jyh-Shyong Ho, Ph,D, Research Scientist National Center for High Performance Computing Hsinchu, Taiwan, ROC
Jyh-Shyong Ho
Hi,
I updated the OS of my Opteron cluster from SuSE9.1 to SuSE9.3 ( not New Installation), the installation went smoothly, however, I found that not all original system configurations were kept:
1. I am not able to use rsh among all nodes in the cluster.
2. The NAT server on the master node is no longer working, I am not able to reach computers outside from client nodes. Here are the original configuration:
On the master node (140.110.17.10), I included the following llines in file /etc/init.d/boot.local
modprobe ip_tables modprobe ip_nat_ftp modprobe ip_nat_irc modprobe ip_conntrack modprobe ip_conntrack_ftp modprobe ip_conntrack_irc iptables -F; iptables -t nat -F iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j SNAT --to 140.110.17.10 echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
And defined the gateway to 192.168.3.100 (the internal IP address of the master node) on all client nodes. On SuSE 9.1, this configuartion works normally.
And it should work on 9.3 as well. But perhaps the above is done too early?
3. In directory /etc/init.d/rc3.d, nfs always executes earlier than ypbind, regardless the assigned numbers, e.g.,
We execute them in parallel. If you need a dependency from nfs on ypbind, add it to the file or execute them serially (there's an option in /etc/sysconfig for this)
[...] During the system boot, my intention is to start ypbind before nfs, but SuSE9.3 always execute nfs before ypbind.
4. If install SuSE9.3 as New Installation, I am not able to enable xinetd with YAST2, many network services (e.g. telnet server) are not available.
Is the telnetd package installed?
I realize that SuSE9.3 has changed many system default configurations for security reason, but some of these changes caused above problems.
Only a few options have been changed.
Perhaps someone can give me some hints so I can restore my original environment under SuSE9.3? Thanks.
Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, aj@suse.de, http://www.suse.de/~aj SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
On Sun, Jul 24, 2005 at 11:43:24AM +0800, Jyh-Shyong Ho wrote:
3. In directory /etc/init.d/rc3.d, nfs always executes earlier than ypbind, regardless the assigned numbers, e.g.,
9.3 uses dependencies for the ordering of init scripts. You can edit the # Required-Start: ... lines in the init scripts by hand to change the ordering.
4. If install SuSE9.3 as New Installation, I am not able to enable xinetd with YAST2, many network services (e.g. telnet server) are not available.
If they were installed before they should still be there. To let it start by default use chkconfig xinetd on -Andi
On Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 05:12:05PM -0500, Roy F. cabaniss wrote:
I have it. It even said contact suse in the box it came in for tech support. Getting it to run on a amd64 though.....
when i goto execute I get the following messages.
./civctp
Known problem, but nobody has tracked it down so far. You might try LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.18 linux32 --3gb civctp If that doesn't help most likely it needs older shared libraries. -Andi
On Monday 25 July 2005 19:19, Andi Kleen wrote:
On Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 05:12:05PM -0500, Roy F. cabaniss wrote:
I have it. It even said contact suse in the box it came in for tech support. Getting it to run on a amd64 though.....
when i goto execute I get the following messages.
./civctp
Known problem, but nobody has tracked it down so far.
You might try
LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.18 linux32 --3gb civctp
nope. didin't help. I got the same errors when I tried this as I did before. Pity really since civ is a great game.
If that doesn't help most likely it needs older shared libraries.
-Andi
-- Roy F. Cabaniss http://www.housedraco.org
As i remember you should tye FIRST update the game by downloading the patch first manual. The apply it using the linux32 command. After that try start the game using also the linux32 command. It worked for my using both suse 9.2 and suse 9.3 (64 bit version) __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
On Wednesday 27 July 2005 10:50, Karaoulis Marios wrote:
As i remember you should tye FIRST update the game by downloading the patch first manual. The apply it using the linux32 command.
This is wierd. I got threee files CivCTP-1.1-x86-english.sh CivCTP-1.2-data-english.sh CivCTP-1.2-x86-english.sh which should be the upgrades. Regardless of how I try to invoke them (linux32, sh, making them executable etc) I get the following message. linux32 ./CivCTP-1.1-x86-english.sh Verifying archive integrity...OK Uncompressing CivCTP 1.0 -> 1.1 Upgradetrap: usage: trap [-lp] [[arg] signal_spec ...] However the file size never changes nor have any files been unp[acked and installed somewhere no my computer. It is like it is going "ok I will tell you I shall uncompress it if you insist, but I'm not gonna REALLY do it."
After that try start the game using also the linux32 command.
It worked for my using both suse 9.2 and suse 9.3 (64 bit version) __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
-- Roy F. Cabaniss http://www.housedraco.org
participants (5)
-
Andi Kleen -
Andreas Jaeger -
Jyh-Shyong Ho -
Karaoulis Marios -
Roy F. cabaniss