I was able to confirm that reverting the samba package back to 3.0.2a-40 solves my problem of not being able to set file permissions to "read only" from my XP box. I'd tried just about everything and couldn't get it to work. I could copy a "read only" file to the share, I could remove the "read only" bit from the share, however, I could not for the life of me get it to set the "read only". Which was important for source control. Also, there not being a local echo for smbclient is still a problem. B-)
Brad Bourn <brad@summitrd.com> writes:
I was able to confirm that reverting the samba package back to 3.0.2a-40 solves my problem of not being able to set file permissions to "read only" from my XP box.
Is this on 9.1?
I'd tried just about everything and couldn't get it to work. I could copy a "read only" file to the share, I could remove the "read only" bit from the share, however, I could not for the life of me get it to set the "read only". Which was important for source control.
Also, there not being a local echo for smbclient is still a problem.
Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, aj@suse.de, http://www.suse.de/~aj SUSE Linux AG, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
Yep, 9.1 amd64 w/ 1 gig ram B-) On Thursday 29 July 2004 11:03 pm, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
Brad Bourn <brad@summitrd.com> writes:
I was able to confirm that reverting the samba package back to 3.0.2a-40 solves my problem of not being able to set file permissions to "read only" from my XP box.
Is this on 9.1?
I'd tried just about everything and couldn't get it to work. I could copy a "read only" file to the share, I could remove the "read only" bit from the share, however, I could not for the life of me get it to set the "read only". Which was important for source control.
Also, there not being a local echo for smbclient is still a problem.
Andreas
participants (2)
-
Andreas Jaeger -
Brad Bourn