![](https://seccdn.libravatar.org/avatar/c91f738a693a5c64c2ef380773883aba.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Kees Hoekzema wrote: | On Tuesday 21 September 2004 20:00, mmarion@qualcomm.com wrote: | |>Does anyone else have any decent comparisons of more real-world apps (not |>just synthetic benchmarks) between differing 64bit archs, especially |>opteron vs Intel? | | I currently have an 3.0GHz Xeon (w/ em64t), a 3.6Ghz xeon (w/ em64t) and some | dual opterons (244,248, maybe 250 too). Those are for reviewing. | | First I want to compare MySQL benchmarks, using both 32 and 64 bits binaries | and a mysql compiled from source with gcc 3.4.x. The benchmark will consist | of a copy of our database and running a script that does some real-life | queries on it with different concurrency levels. Secondly i want to compare | webserver performance, apache 2.x w/ dynamic PHP scripts and tux for static | files, lets see which platform is the best webserver. | Alternativly I want to time some comilations (how fast can they compile a | vanilla kernel 10 times etc, useless but a nice comparison ;)). | | |>Would love to see more application comparisons though. | | | If you have any more idea's of real-world benchmarks, please say so, and i'll | try to get them tested too and post the results back to the list. | | Ultimatly I want to put together a series of (public available) real-world | benchmarks which I want to run on quite some platforms to get a nice overview | of speed improvements. | | - kees | InfoWorld's September 20 issue has a test/comparison of the em64t vs. Opteron. http://www.infoworld.com/article/04/09/17/38FE64shootout2_1.html John -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFBXBSH5JB+bPW3+KwRAsIRAJ97X9y/3vaqEWEiPZ13rifxYL4s3gCeIqdt UbZx82y1ms1d7qJ58ml3fxg= =rgQJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----