Mailinglist Archive: radeonhd (307 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [radeonhd] xf86-video-radeonhd:r6xx-r7xx-support: 1 commit(s)
- From: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 13:06:00 -0500
- Message-id: <a728f9f90902131006p44839caya5c518482c86bfda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Matthias Hopf <mhopf@xxxxxxx> wrote:
What would be selected automatically? Whether the you the sync packet
or the current setup, you still need to specify what caches to flush.
I suppose the VC/TC logic for vertex flushing could be moved to the
surface_sync function. Also, the surface_sync function can also be
used to flush destination cases as well.
Alex
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: radeonhd+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: radeonhd+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
On Feb 10, 09 16:38:43 -0800, Alex Deucher wrote:
M82: Missed one in the previous commit
Alex, if you used the Type 3 packet as in r600_demo
flush_gpu_source_cache(), this should be selected correctly
automatically. And I personally think that this name better describes
what the function actually does.
What would be selected automatically? Whether the you the sync packet
or the current setup, you still need to specify what caches to flush.
I suppose the VC/TC logic for vertex flushing could be moved to the
surface_sync function. Also, the surface_sync function can also be
used to flush destination cases as well.
Alex
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: radeonhd+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: radeonhd+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |