1 May
2012
1 May
'12
17:04
John Andersen wrote:
On 5/1/2012 2:17 AM, Per Jessen wrote:
There's no ground for treating the signature separately.
That view is contrary to the entire history and meme of email sigs on the internet.
Often these are inserted by a script, totally disconnected from message content. You are advocating treating random witticisms equally with directly written content.
Certainly - the author configured his or her email-agent to insert random blurps, so he or she is responsible. Who else?? -- Per Jessen, Zürich (18.4°C) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org