I thought someone wrote some months ago, that the path of gnome was more evolution, instead of the "revolution"-ary path of KDE.
Ah, more meaningless broad and vague generalizations.
What is meaningless and broad there? Gnome creates 3.0 by taking 2.8 and adding features. KDE creates 4.0 by tossing 3.5.10 out the window and rewriting everything. Then they release 4.0 as a developers-only release, and even 4.1 was for "early adopters". KDE 4.4 is still missing some of the most basic features, such as photo metadata in the file browser. I have filed or triaged well over 1200 bugs at KDE for tens of users, before you go attacking my stance by attacking my interests or intentions. -- Dotan Cohen http://bido.com http://what-is-what.com Please CC me if you want to be sure that I read your message. I do not read all list mail. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org