Philipp Thomas wrote:
On Sun, 22 Jun 2008 11:18:33 -0700, John Andersen wrote:
So, punish the users for their preference, is that it Steve?
Which part of 'As long as users give us not concrete feedback' didn't you understand?
It simply means (like Anders already pointed out) that if users give us specific feedback as to which functionality is missing or which functionality doesn't work as expected and report that via bugzilla so it can be tracked, the chances are much higher that either KDE3 stays a bit longer or that KDE4 gets the features you want.
That's a crock, and you know it. Why should users have to go out specifically look for every single functionality of KDE 3.5 to see if it still exists. The devs not only have the 3.5 code...they're also proficient at READING IT... they already know what 3.5 can do and can't do. Just because I know C++ doesn't mean I can just pick up the code from a project like KDE and figure out what is going on where, without taking a significant period of time to study it -- which my employers does NOT pay me to do. And when I'm off work, I don't have the time to sort through that much code just to make sure that the devs are doing what they should have been doing in the first place.
Philipp
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org