Peter Cannon wrote:
On Sunday 12 November 2006 12:33, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
There is also a good reason not to. Let's take the promiment example of LKML, where you do not have to be subscribed. So you have to be Cc'ed or To'ed somehow. Second case LKML: People throw all their list mails into one folder (the unimportant stuff) and get a direct reply for threads they have taken part in. That's why your patch is often ignored when just submitted to lkml without any persons directly cc'ed.
Aaah!! this is starting to 'P&*$' me off its got to be the list sending me two of everything, I've heard of two for the price of one but its getting annoying
I'm already on a number of differant mailing lists and the extra load is distracting, if while reading one list suddenley theres 37 new posts you brain thinks "Heads up whats going on over there" only to find that its double bluff.
Has 10.1 flakyness crept into the list server?
No, it is your setup. I am subscribed to several mailing lists, some have been redirected to the new list server, some haven't. No double posts have appeared on my server. I would suggest you do some more in-depth analysis, before you scream murder. - Is the message-id really the same in those double mails? - Are they delivered to the same address (again, look at the header)? Sandy -- List replies only please! Please address PMs to: news-reply2 (@) japantest (.) homelinux (.) com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org