Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (3232 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse] Re: Sources, revisited
- From: Eberhard Moenkeberg <emoenke@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 11:44:11 +0200 (CEST)
- Message-id: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0608161139410.4308@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi,
On Wed, 16 Aug 2006, Karl Eichwalder wrote:
With a list server attached "Reply-To", _NOT_ANY_ handcrafting would be necessary _ANYWHERE_.
Please tell me a practical reason... I do not see anything else than
a chance for posters to use "split addresses", i.e. to direct list answers away from the list.
Cheers -e
--
Eberhard Moenkeberg (emoenke@xxxxxxx, em@xxxxxxx)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 16 Aug 2006, Karl Eichwalder wrote:
Eberhard Moenkeberg <emoenke@xxxxxxx> writes:
You do not know what you are speaking about.
I have just gone through such a matter in suse-sles-e, with a lengthy
thread which since long did no more interest me, but some of the posters
again and again did the default reply.
Add "Mail-Copies-To: never" to your message header and hope the best.
At least, Gnus honors this setting.
With a list server attached "Reply-To", _NOT_ANY_ handcrafting would be necessary _ANYWHERE_.
BTW, I appreciate the removal of the Reply-To setting--but I do not
vote.
Please tell me a practical reason... I do not see anything else than
a chance for posters to use "split addresses", i.e. to direct list answers away from the list.
Cheers -e
--
Eberhard Moenkeberg (emoenke@xxxxxxx, em@xxxxxxx)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |