Kevanf1 wrote:
On 4/30/05, Martin Deppe
wrote: Thanks Kevanf1,
I forgot to mention that SuSE 7.3 AND 9.0 are installed on that machine and are running well on it (or should I say walking? I never intended it to be a GUI workstation!).
I don't think 9.2 contains something that basically forbids it to run on that box.
Martin
The only thing I have found is that it (9.2) takes appreciably longer to load at boot than 9.1 But, I do have a full system together with a load of stuff that I could really safely trim back :-) But it really shoudl load on a 166 chip with that much RAM....I would have thought.
Yes, when I tried it first, I think I gave enough time to get up, but
I'll give it another try (tonight) will report then.
But shouldn't it response to